Skip to content

Conversation

@fzyzcjy
Copy link
Collaborator

@fzyzcjy fzyzcjy commented Dec 11, 2025

📌 Description

https://pypi.org/project/flashinfer-python/ seems we have 0.5.3, but the nightly and version is still 0.5.2

🔍 Related Issues

🚀 Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for contributing to FlashInfer! Before we review your pull request, please make sure the following items are complete.

✅ Pre-commit Checks

  • I have installed pre-commit by running pip install pre-commit (or used your preferred method).
  • I have installed the hooks with pre-commit install.
  • I have run the hooks manually with pre-commit run --all-files and fixed any reported issues.

If you are unsure about how to set up pre-commit, see the pre-commit documentation.

🧪 Tests

  • Tests have been added or updated as needed.
  • All tests are passing (unittest, etc.).

Reviewer Notes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Version updated to 0.5.3

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request bumps the project version in version.txt from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3. No functional changes, control flow modifications, or public API updates are included.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Version Update
version.txt
Increment version string from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • yzh119

Poem

🐰 A tiny hop, a number change,
From 0.5.2 to 0.5.3's range,
The version file now marks the day,
When progress bounded forth to play! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Super tiny fix version' directly aligns with the changeset which bumps version.txt from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3, making it clear and specific.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes the required sections and explains the version discrepancy (PyPI shows 0.5.3 while repository is 0.5.2), though checklist items remain unchecked.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fzyzcjy-patch-1

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6bb01d1 and e080ce0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • version.txt (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Deploy Docs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
version.txt (1)

1-1: Version bump to 0.5.3 is correct and complete.

The version.txt change is the single source of truth. The build system automatically propagates this version to all packages (flashinfer, flashinfer-cubin, flashinfer-jit-cache) through build_backend.py, which generates the _build_meta.py module. No additional version updates are needed elsewhere in the codebase.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @fzyzcjy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an inconsistency between the project's internal version tracking and its published PyPI package. It updates the stored version number to "0.5.3", ensuring that the repository accurately reflects the latest official release.

Highlights

  • Version Update: The project version number has been updated from "0.5.2" to "0.5.3" to align with the latest release available on PyPI.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly updates the project version in version.txt to 0.5.3. However, for good project maintainability and to keep users informed, it's crucial to accompany version bumps with corresponding updates to the changelog. I have added a comment suggesting an update to CHANGELOG.md.

@@ -1 +1 @@
0.5.2
0.5.3
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this version bump is correct, please also add a corresponding entry for version 0.5.3 in CHANGELOG.md. Keeping the changelog synchronized with version releases is an important practice for project maintainability, helping users and contributors understand the changes in each version.

@yzh119 yzh119 merged commit 9f1cb89 into main Dec 11, 2025
3 checks passed
@yzh119 yzh119 deleted the fzyzcjy-patch-1 branch December 11, 2025 02:18
fzyzcjy added a commit to fzyzcjy/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
<!-- .github/pull_request_template.md -->

## 📌 Description

https://pypi.org/project/flashinfer-python/ seems we have 0.5.3, but the
nightly and version is still 0.5.2

<!-- What does this PR do? Briefly describe the changes and why they’re
needed. -->

## 🔍 Related Issues

<!-- Link any related issues here -->

## 🚀 Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for contributing to FlashInfer! Before we review your pull
request, please make sure the following items are complete.

### ✅ Pre-commit Checks

- [ ] I have installed `pre-commit` by running `pip install pre-commit`
(or used your preferred method).
- [ ] I have installed the hooks with `pre-commit install`.
- [ ] I have run the hooks manually with `pre-commit run --all-files`
and fixed any reported issues.

> If you are unsure about how to set up `pre-commit`, see [the
pre-commit documentation](https://pre-commit.com/).

## 🧪 Tests

- [ ] Tests have been added or updated as needed.
- [ ] All tests are passing (`unittest`, etc.).

## Reviewer Notes

<!-- Optional: anything you'd like reviewers to focus on, concerns, etc.
-->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Chores**
  * Version updated to 0.5.3

<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

(cherry picked from commit 9f1cb89)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants