-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Efficiency TODO in endpoint.rs #4599
Conversation
3abb58a
to
89471be
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4599 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.13% 82.13% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 255 255
Lines 31269 31267 -2
==========================================
- Hits 25684 25682 -2
Misses 5585 5585
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice improvement! As with #4601, could you squash all the commit and make sure the style tests pass (./tools/devtool checkstyle
)? Thanks!
Style resolved and commits squashed. |
Replaced inefficient for loop with rust native function in endpoint.rs. Signed-off-by: Andrew Yao <[email protected]>
Changes
-replace inefficient for loop with rust native function
...
Reason
Address a todo as is explained in #3273
...
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md
.PR Checklist
PR.
CHANGELOG.md
.TODO
s link to an issue.contribution quality standards.
rust-vmm
.