-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Firestore] Add async counterpart for the addDocument
method
#13407
Open
MojtabaHs
wants to merge
7
commits into
firebase:main
Choose a base branch
from
MojtabaHs:Firestore-async-counterparts
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e7bad94
feat: add the async counterpart of the `addDocument` function with th…
MojtabaHs b2a4966
doc: add throws part
MojtabaHs ac759d0
doc: enhance doc formatting
MojtabaHs 4b9e3b8
style: reformat a line to satisfy the linter line style check
MojtabaHs 73a2461
style: move the function closer to the non-async implementation
MojtabaHs 4e13fe5
feat: add availability to support concurrency
MojtabaHs 77e8c60
feat: catch the throwing error and resume it to the continuation
MojtabaHs File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This catch looks redundant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It catches the possible thrown error by calling the original
addDocument
function (which seems only throwable by the underlying encoder). SincewithCheckedThrowingContinuation
takes a non-throwingclosure
, we can't just rethrow it.Am I missing something here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I see. It looks like the problem is with the existing API above that both throws and does a callback with an error parameter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, I was about to refactor it but stopped because it is part of the public API and would be backward-incompatible.
By the way, it's not clear to me what to
return
when encountering encoding errors.I can open another PR for refactoring the existing API and discuss it further separately. Let me know your opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About this PR, how about moving this function back to the
CollectionReference+AsyncAwait
and using the existing API there like:So no need for
withCheckedThrowingContinuation
at all.Why move this to the other file? Because otherwise, this extension would depend on another extension.
Let me know your opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See #9157 (comment) for a discussion about an edge case when the client is offline. This would result in the async method never returning.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using this method will depend on the existing
async
API. So, at the end of the day, we should either deprecate both of them or agree on the current existing logic.