You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are lots of JMH benchmarks. The most high level ones are the Query* Benchmarks, one of them tests simultaneous ingestion and querying.
The idea is to try to measure some QPS for various standard queries, and to measure some aspects of ingestion. However, to be honest local benchmarks can only tell you so much; really what is needed is good distributed testing. There is some of that in-house, but kinda difficult to standardize…. We have some Gatling stuff which is not open sourced. A contribution for for example Docker compose or some setup which can allow easy distributed testing by third parties would be pretty awesome…
On Aug 21, 2020, at 1:04 AM, Szymon Matejczyk ***@***.***> wrote:
I was wondering: do you have any E2E benchmarks of FiloDB?
I'm not interested in the pure results, but more of how you're thinking of performance requirements for Filo.
If not, do you think it's not worth having them?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#868>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIDPW4WM2PX3U5BQGQWOE3SBYTANANCNFSM4QHASO7Q>.
I was wondering: do you have any E2E benchmarks of FiloDB?
I'm not interested in the pure results, but more of how you're thinking of performance requirements for Filo.
If not, do you think it's not worth having them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: