feat(f3): load the power table once per tipset#13106
Merged
Conversation
Previously, we limited ourselves to loading 4 power tables at once, but would happily load one power table 4 times. Now, we'll load as many power tables as we need in parallel, but will only do so once per power table.
Stebalien
force-pushed
the
steb/f3-power-table-once
branch
from
fbd9463 to
514574b
Compare
Kubuxu
approved these changes
May 7, 2025
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from 📌 Triage
to ✔️ Approved by reviewer
in FilOz
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from ✔️ Approved by reviewer
to 🎉 Done
in FilOz
8 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, we limited ourselves to loading 4 power tables at once, but would happily load one power table 4 times. Now, we do the same but ALSO avoid using all 4 jobs to load the same power table.
IMO, we should consider increasing this from 4.