[DataCap Application] <Xinjiang Nongyuan Jiaye Agricultural Investment Co., Ltd> - <agricultural data>

[Brady168]

Data Owner Name

Xinjiang Nongyuan Jiaye Agricultural Investment Co., Ltd

What is your role related to the dataset

Dataset Owner

Data Owner Country/Region

China

Data Owner Industry

Resources, Agriculture & Fisheries

Website

N/A

Social Media

Email:[email protected]

Total amount of DataCap being requested

4PiB

Expected size of single dataset (one copy)

500T

Number of replicas to store

7

Weekly allocation of DataCap requested

400TiB

On-chain address for first allocation

f1txfwjexmp4gp3dqdglgc3i7qacnyseocs4cecky

Data Type of Application

Public, Open Dataset (Research/Non-Profit)

Custom multisig

• Use Custom Multisig

Identifier

No response

Share a brief history of your project and organization

Xinjiang Nongyuan Jiaye Agricultural Investment Co., Ltd. was established on July 26, 2016, and its registered address is 604, Floor 6, Jiangnan Senior Apartment, Saiwai, No. 1096, Karamay West Street, Saybag District, Ürümqi, Xinjiang. Its legal representative is Li Zhifeng. The business scope includes agricultural technology extension services, crop planting, agricultural services, Agricultural science research and experimental development, agricultural tourism, import and export of goods and technology, online trade agents, software and information technology services, Information technology consulting consulting services, vocational skills training, poultry breeding; Sales: agricultural products, livestock products, fresh aquatic products, daily necessities, vegetables and fruits; Wholesale and retail: pre packaged food and bulk food.

Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?

No

If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders

No response

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

Video files include displays of farmland, various plants and animals, research data and images, etc

Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from

My Own Storage Infra

If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

If you are a data preparer. What is your location (City and Country)

Xinjiang, China

If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?

Our technical department has tested and mastered the packaging data and issued the order command, using the branch packaging data under singularity, and using the boost tool to issue the order.

If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)

Our own technical department prepares the data

Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.

N/A

Please share a sample of the data

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1nDKibmicmL4-c7YCEWwACMwA_SxrtCTE?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1eiaYIB4X-yG3zRZtaKElF-iLoC1VtU7j?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1mqyXgA1P0dfb8r9rhli3T-lL2676SJXz?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1V90RWTvFyZRA8hLshPse8mgXPNocQtm7?usp=drive_link

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network

• I confirm

If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason

No response

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data

Monthly

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin

More than 3 years

In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals

Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, South America, Europe

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers

HTTP or FTP server, Shipping hard drives, Venus built-in data transfer

How do you plan to choose storage providers

Slack, Partners

If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use

No response

If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below

f02301
f03223
f0240185
f0143858
f02215422
f02062851

How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers

Boost client

If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline

Yes

[large-datacap-requests]

Thanks for your request!

Heads up, you’re requesting more than the typical weekly onboarding rate of DataCap!

[large-datacap-requests]

Thanks for your request!
Everything looks good. 👌

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

[Sunnyiscoming]

• Have you prepared enough token for sector pledge?
• Are you a data preparer? What is your previous experience as a data-preparer? List previous applications and client IDs.
• Please list Miner ID, Business Entity, Location of sps you will cooperate with. (f02301, f03223, f0240185, f0143858, f02215422, f02062851)
• Could you send an email with business license to [email protected] with your official domain in order to confirm your identity? Email name should includes the issue id [DataCap Application] <Xinjiang Nongyuan Jiaye Agricultural Investment Co., Ltd> - <agricultural data> #2129.

[Sunnyiscoming]

Hi @Brady168

Per the filecoin-project/notary-governance#922 for Open, Public Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.

This information will be reviewed by Fil+ Governance team to confirm validity and then the application will be triggered for notary review. Let us know if you have any questions.

[Brady168]

• Have you prepared enough token for sector pledge?

SPs they said they have enough tokens ready to pledge.

• Are you a data preparer? What is your previous experience as a data-preparer? List previous applications and client IDs.

Our technical department has tested and mastered the packaging data and issued the order command, using the branch packaging data under singularity, and using the boost tool to issue the order.

• Please list Miner ID, Business Entity, Location of sps you will cooperate with. (f02301, f03223, f0240185, f0143858, f02215422, f02062851)

f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 belong to topblocks， Location：Santa Clara(US)
f02215422 belong to Li Location：Hong Kong
f02062851 belong to mike Location：California(US)

• Could you send an email with business license to [email protected] with your official domain in order to confirm your identity? Email name should includes the issue id [DataCap Application] <Xinjiang Nongyuan Jiaye Agricultural Investment Co., Ltd> -  #2129.

Applying and will be sent tomorrow morning

[Brady168]

Hi @Brady168

Per the filecoin-project/notary-governance#922 for Open, Public Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data.

This information will be reviewed by Fil+ Governance team to confirm validity and then the application will be triggered for notary review. Let us know if you have any questions.

@Sunnyiscoming The form has been submitted, please check back and we look forward to hearing from you!

[Brady168]

@Sunnyiscoming

The business license has been sent, please keep it properly and do not disclose it,thanks.

[ghost]

Hello, confirming the following SP Entities were submitted:
f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 Top Blocks USA
f02215422 Hong Kong
f02062851 California

We are in contact with f02062851 to confirm location

[MatrixStorage]

The use of agricultural data will help agricultural results, I will pay attention to this project, if everything is compliant, I will support it.

[Brady168]

Hello, confirming the following SP Entities were submitted: f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 Top Blocks USA f02215422 Hong Kong f02062851 California

We are in contact with f02062851 to confirm location

f02062851 He told me he'd replied.

[Brady168]

The use of agricultural data will help agricultural results, I will pay attention to this project, if everything is compliant, I will support it.

Thank you.

[ghost]

Hello @Brady168 your form does not include SP business emails or proof of SP entities. Please confirm

[Brady168]

@Filplus-govteam They all belong to individuals, so none of them have business emails and some of them have never received an email confirming the entity, can you specify?

[ghost]

OK @Brady168 so we have:
4 IDs for f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 Top Blocks California USA
f02215422 Hong Kong
f02062851 Stockton California USA Mike who we cannot truly confirm LINK

[Brady168]

@Filplus-govteam If some of the SPs do not pass the review, I will temporarily terminate the cooperation with him until he passes the review, which is currently just f02062851 right?

[herrehesse]

@Brady168 Hello friend!

Thank you for your LDN application, we can see that you are new here without any previous reputation, and your ask a large sum of datacap. Can you explain to me why that is? Love to learn.

Thank you!

[Brady168]

@herrehesse Hi，

We are currently using a cloud server + physical storage to store our company's data, but this cost is too high, I learned in the WeChat public number currently fil + can be stored for free, it would like to try, so the system to learn, and in accordance with the actual situation of the application.

[ghost]

FYI @Sunnyiscoming

[Sunnyiscoming]

Datacap Request Trigger

Total DataCap requested

4PiB

Expected weekly DataCap usage rate

400TiB

Client address

f1txfwjexmp4gp3dqdglgc3i7qacnyseocs4cecky

[large-datacap-requests]

DataCap Allocation requested

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f1txfwjexmp4gp3dqdglgc3i7qacnyseocs4cecky

DataCap allocation requested

200TiB

Id

fa93efc3-c3c0-42a8-b8a2-cdd2600a822a

[cryptowhizzard]

@Brady168

"4 IDs for f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 Top Blocks California USA
f02215422 Hong Kong
f02062851 Stockton California USA Mike who we cannot truly confirm #2126 (comment)"

This is what you supplied. In the LDN you mention 7 replica's.

Let me make clear that you can send only 1 replica of this set to TopBlocks ... you have to share the set with f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 and they are not allowed to receive the same CID's. How are you going to accomplish that?

Secondly , there are only 2 SP's left for replica 2 and 3. Where are the other 4 replica's going?

[ghost]

Please clarify before 2nd notary signature @Brady168

[Brady168]

@Brady168

"4 IDs for f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 Top Blocks California USA f02215422 Hong Kong f02062851 Stockton California USA Mike who we cannot truly confirm #2126 (comment)"

I also went to see the relevant response for #2126 , which is the same as the fact I understand

This is what you supplied. In the LDN you mention 7 replica's.

Let me make clear that you can send only 1 replica of this set to TopBlocks ... you have to share the set with f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 and they are not allowed to receive the same CID's. How are you going to accomplish that?

Secondly , there are only 2 SP's left for replica 2 and 3. Where are the other 4 replica's going?

Based on the rules I understand, one SP ID can store one copy. Currently, I have 6 SP IDs and can store 6 copies. Can I understand this?I'll just make sure they don't go over 30% of the total cap.

@cryptowhizzard @Filplus-govteam Thank you for your review.

[cryptowhizzard]

@Brady168

No , you can not send 4 replica's of this set to 1 organization. This is called self-dealing.

[Brady168]

@Brady168

No , you can not send 4 replica's of this set to 1 organization. This is called self-dealing.

Is there a link to the relevant rules?
It's not my sp. How can it be called self-dealing?

[cryptowhizzard]

See your screenshot above. One storage provider can hold / is holding more then one miner machines.

Top Blocks is the storage provider in this case. They should not exceed 30% of the datacap. Given you have 3 entity's in your disclosure and 7 replica's to store this won't work. Reason i am calling out to you to make you aware.

[Brady168]

See your screenshot above. One storage provider can hold / is holding more then one miner machines.

Top Blocks is the storage provider in this case. They should not exceed 30% of the datacap. Given you have 3 entity's in your disclosure and 7 replica's to store this won't work. Reason i am calling out to you to make you aware.

I understand an SP ID, not an organization.

[Brady168]

See your screenshot above. One storage provider can hold / is holding more then one miner machines.
Top Blocks is the storage provider in this case. They should not exceed 30% of the datacap. Given you have 3 entity's in your disclosure and 7 replica's to store this won't work. Reason i am calling out to you to make you aware.

I understand an SP ID, not an organization.

@Filplus-govteam Can you explain that?

[Brady168]

@cryptowhizzard I guarantee that their total allocation will not exceed 30%, and I will continue to look for more SPs

[cryptowhizzard]

@Brady168 Thank you!

As Filplus-govteam stated: 4 IDs for f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 Top Blocks California USA
These all belong to topblocks , thus they are one service provider and should not exceed 30%.

You stated in your LDN that you were going to store 7 replica's of this set.
100% / 7 = 14.xx % per service provider.

You have given 3 SP's in this case. I suggest you look for 4 extra to send the remaining replica's.
Please make sure you send each CID once to Topblocks. My question is, how are you going to do that? Please elaborate to build thrust and show that you know what you are doing ;-)

[Brady168]

@Brady168 Thank you!

As Filplus-govteam stated: 4 IDs for f02301,f03223,f0240185,f0143858 Top Blocks California USA These all belong to topblocks , thus they are one service provider and should not exceed 30%.

You stated in your LDN that you were going to store 7 replica's of this set. 100% / 7 = 14.xx % per service provider.

You have given 3 SP's in this case. I suggest you look for 4 extra to send the remaining replica's. Please make sure you send each CID once to Topblocks. My question is, how are you going to do that? Please elaborate to build thrust and show that you know what you are doing ;-)

I'll look into it with my tech department on how to do it and reply later, but it will definitely go on according to the rules, so please monitor it, thank you!

[Brady168]

You have given 3 SP's in this case. I suggest you look for 4 extra to send the remaining replica's. Please make sure you send each CID once to Topblocks. My question is, how are you going to do that? Please elaborate to build thrust and show that you know what you are doing ;-)

@cryptowhizzard Hi,Ensuring that the same replica only sends one deal once in those 4 SP ID solves the problem，right?

[cryptowhizzard]

You have given 3 SP's in this case. I suggest you look for 4 extra to send the remaining replica's. Please make sure you send each CID once to Topblocks. My question is, how are you going to do that? Please elaborate to build thrust and show that you know what you are doing ;-)

@cryptowhizzard Hi,Ensuring that the same replica only sends one deal once in those 4 SP ID solves the problem，right?

Given that you have for example 4 deals in a dataset.

Deal A should go to provider 1 from Topblocks , not B / C / D , Replica 1
Deal B should go to provider 2 from Topblocks, not A / C / D, Replica 1
Deal C should go to provider 3 from Topblocks, not A / B / D, Replica 1
Deal D should go to provider 4 from Topblocks, not A / B / C, Replica 1

Deal A / B / C / D should go to f02215422 ( Replica 2 )
Deal A / B / C / D should go to f02062851 ( Replica 3 )

Deal A / B / C / D should go to another SP ( i suggested ) ( Replica 4 ).

And so on.

[kevzak]

checker:manualTrigger

[filplus-checker-app]

DataCap and CID Checker Report¹

No application info found for this issue on https://filplus.d.interplanetary.one/clients.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

[kevzak]

@Brady168 need to provide 4 different SP entities and locations. Please provide an updated list

[Brady168]

@Brady168 need to provide 4 different SP entities and locations. Please provide an updated list

I'm contacting more SPs and will post them later, thanks!

[github-actions]

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

--
Commented by Stale Bot.

[Brady168]

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

-- Commented by Stale Bot.

Please continue to be open, thank you

[github-actions]

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

--
Commented by Stale Bot.

[Brady168]

Please continue to be open, thank you

[github-actions]

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

--
Commented by Stale Bot.

[Brady168]

Please continue to be open, thank you

[github-actions]

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

--
Commented by Stale Bot.

[Brady168]

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

-- Commented by Stale Bot.

keep it open

[kevzak]

Closing until SPs provided