[DataCap Application] Speedium - NIH NCBI Sequence Read Archive [FULL SET] #2008
Comments
large-datacap-requests
bot
added
efil+
|
We have successfully stored 7 out of 27 NiH LDN applications totalling 5 PiB of data each (with some applications closing below 2 PiB). This final open application will consolidate the remaining 8 to 27 applications into a single large LDN (Large Data Network). By doing so, we aim to enhance transparency, communication, and notary signing processes, offering a perfect solution for community transparency. We are currently awaiting the completion of our last datacap application and plan to seek manual assistance from Simon or Deep later this week. Should you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to reach out to us below. |
|
@kevzak We are assigned to FIL-E, can you put us back into a regular LDN? |
|
Hello @cryptowhizzard - as was discussed on previous Notary Governance calls and also announced here, any application (public or private) over 15PiBs will now go through the full upfront check process via E-Fil+. Please complete the steps listed here and I will review and trigger the application for notary review. |
|
I can confirm that @cryptowhizzard has completed the E-Fil+ Registration form and is sharing all information about the dataset and SPs involved. Also, because this is a public, open dataset, there is no KYB required. |
Datacap Request TriggerTotal DataCap requested
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
Client address
|
|
Thanks for your request! |
Datacap Request TriggerTotal DataCap requested
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
Client address
|
DataCap Allocation requestedMultisig Notary address
Client address
DataCap allocation requested
Id
|
large-datacap-requests
bot
added
efil+
|
@kevzak |
|
What I understand is that the governance proposal is to increase the upper limit of a single LDN from 5P to 15P. Is it my misunderstanding? Or will the rules be updated again? |
|
@sxxfuture-official @Joss-Hua there seems to be some confusion here. Let me attempt to clarify for you because this is the first example of an application in this new process: Regarding the DataCap request limits:
Regarding this specific application:
Regarding SXX comment: We should investigate the legality and rationality of data use, evidence of data download, transmission, storage, and processing capabilities, and background investigation of SPs. This is exactly the correct thinking and expectation the community should have regarding notary due diligence. I agree: For notaries, please check the applicant, check the data, check the SPs involved. With E-Fil+, a lot of this information is already collected in the application to help notaries complete due diligence. For example: The applicant has shared a sample and they have shared the SPs involved. They have also completed 7 previous applications that can be reviewed on the CID Checker Report LINK1 LINK2 for this dataset. In conclusion: The applicant is following the Fil+ program rules by using one application for a complete dataset. Notaries, feel free to review their application information above and also the previous storage history with this dataset and post any questions in the comments as needed. |
|
I don't think Speedium is capable of utilizing such a large amount of DataCap. First, most of the NIH NCBI Sequence Read Archive applications are still in progress and have not been further encapsulated in the last few weeks. Second, there are numerous problems with the DC usage reports for all of these applications. For example, data duplication and CID sharing between applications with non-identical data sets. Third, a large number of their previous applications included data set mixups, numerous notary approvals without providing data sets or data samples, and the actual usage of DataCap did not match the allocation plan provided. Last, I would like to remind everyone that the proposal to remove DC request limit is still in the pilot phase. We can't predict the impact of the modification yet. It is illogical to approve a DataCap of 120PiB during the 6-week trial period. filecoin-project/notary-governance#851 (comment) |
|
Additionally, so many queries about Speedium are glossed over with reasons such as it happened a long time ago and why we were questioned so many times, instead of providing direct explanations. They question the miners from Asia as judges, criticizing their explanations, but not acknowledging the violations they are involved in. As a global project, it would be damaging the harmony of the community if officials did not intervene and investigate in a timely manner. cc @dkkapur @dannyob @jbenet |
|
Dear @Yvette516 , Thank you for raising this matter once again. We share your commitment to maintaining the integrity of the platform and actively working to expose any fraudulent activities. Most of the NIH NCBI Sequence Read Archive applications are closed now. Thank you for reminding us. In regards to the application from Speedium, there have been multiple explanations provided that address the concerns you wish to discuss. These explanations clearly outline the reasons for the issue, the implemented solution, and confirm that the problem has not recurred. You can find additional details in the following links:
While we understand that you may have differing opinions on the matter, it is important to acknowledge that the responsible party, Cryptowhizzard, has resolved the issue and addressed the question you raised, months before. We kindly request that you consider the information provided and refrain from engaging in further attempts of gaslighting. However, we want to emphasise that open and respectful debates are welcome within our community. We value diverse perspectives and encourage constructive discussions. In this regard, we invite you to participate in the public Trust and Transparency call scheduled for tomorrow. It will provide an opportunity to engage in a comprehensive debate and address any remaining concerns you may have regarding fraudulent activities. If you are unwilling to listen to the answers provided for each of your questions, there is no reason for me to keep responding. I have engaged in discussions with multiple FIL+ admins, and we have collectively agreed to address all the points raised during the T&T call. Your absence from such discussions reflects the level of seriousness you attribute to the matter.
Everyone is fully aware of our business operations, including: @dkkapur @kevzak @Kevin-FF-USA @raghavrmadya and @galen-mcandrew |
Request ProposedYour Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary Message sent to Filecoin Network
Address
Datacap Allocated
Signer Address
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecblyxdz7acpmss2fbdbx5kgbblvigxwzkgwkaiovjf3o3k4b2mls |
|
checker:manualTrigger |
DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary1Storage Provider DistributionDeal Data Replication✔️ Data replication looks healthy. Deal Data Shared with other Clients2
Full reportClick here to view the CID Checker report. Footnotes |
One of the best distributions of datasets I have ever seen. |
|
LGTM |
Request ApprovedYour Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary Message sent to Filecoin Network
Address
Datacap Allocated
Signer Address
Id
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedggnmngw2oceuiundzhvjt3iqop3hmmn6jye7viikqhmk7n4hlxm |
|
Hello, @cryptowhizzard per the filecoin-project/notary-governance#922 for Open, Public Dataset applicants, please complete the following Fil+ registration form to identify yourself as the applicant and also please add the contact information of the SP entities you are working with to store copies of the data. This information will be reviewed by Fil+ Governance team to confirm validity and then the application will be allowed to move forward for additional notary review. |
|
@Sunnyiscoming SPs are provided in application at the top for this one. | MinerID | City | Continent | Business/Entity | |
|
Basicly mismatch between the actual SPs and the list provided:
|
|
@simonkim0515 @Destore2023 Here is the minerID list. Fully. For #922.
|
|
Thank you for providing an updated list here |
|
This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open. -- |
|
checker:manualTrigger |
1: CID sharing exists, completely unrelated projects |
|
|
@Sunnyiscoming @kevzak @simonkim0515 Please close this LDN |
|
@Sunnyiscoming @kevzak @simonkim0515 Please close this LDN |
|
The LDN applied for by Dcent sends transactions to Dcent itself. Isn't this illegal? |
|
@Sunnyiscoming @kevzak @simonkim0515 Please close this LDN |
|
@Filplus-govteam |
|
Hello @nicelove666, @Tom-OriginStorage, and @io10xx, I want to express my gratitude for your attention to my LDN's and your efforts to address them. This level of diligence is exactly what I expect from our community, and I encourage you to maintain this high standard for everyone involved. Additionally, as previously mentioned in various communications and in the 2008 LDN, one of our sealing entities, Dimitr | 4 | BR/BE, has demonstrated significantly faster sealing than others. Since early August, when we became aware of this, we have redirected deals away from their facility, resulting in a decrease in data from over 3PiB to 2.78PiB. This decline will continue as other Service Providers catch up in sealing. There is no need to revisit this issue; we have already discussed it around 25 times. The @Filplus-govteam is fully informed about the situation. The same applies to the bug with HOLON, which caused CID sharing of 0.004% of this LDN. We have already clarified this issue 15 times. Regarding the comment that "many SP's are in the same computer room," I must point out that this LDN is among the best distributed in the world. This argument is pointless. We are currently investigating why the CID checker is reporting more copies than expected and will provide an update on this matter soon. |
|
SPs taking deals: @herrehesse please provide an update on SPs listed here versus entity list you provided above. #2008 (comment) |
|
@kevzak Working on it. Since the list is quite big I need a day to properly note. Lots through BigDataExchange Q1 & Q2 this year. |
|
SP List provided: |
|
Client address f1mgnwoczfj25foxn4555wvwyak6rsynzy7z73azy is present in other Fil+ applications (#2111). This may cause unexpected behavior. |
large-datacap-requests
bot
added
the
duplicated address
|
Closed on request of Fil+ team |
ghost
mentioned this issue
and others
Data Owner Name
NIH - National Institute of Health
What is your role related to the dataset
Data Preparer
Data Owner Country/Region
United States
Data Owner Industry
Life Science / Healthcare
Website
https://www.nih.gov/
Social Media
Total amount of DataCap being requested
120 PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
15 PiB
Number of replicas to store
10
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
1PiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1mgnwoczfj25foxn4555wvwyak6rsynzy7z73azy
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Dataset (Research/Non-Profit)
Custom multisig
Identifier
efil
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
AWS Cloud
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
How do you plan to prepare the dataset
IPFS, lotus, singularity
If you answered "other/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Monthly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
1 to 1.5 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America, Europe, Australia (continent)
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, IPFS, Lotus built-in data transfer
How do you plan to choose storage providers
Slack, Big Data Exchange, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you plan to use
No response
If you already have a list of storage providers to work with, fill out their names and provider IDs below
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
No response
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: