Skip to content

Conversation

@delvedor
Copy link
Member

@delvedor delvedor commented Mar 8, 2021

Currently, we are throwing an error for a valid use case, eg:

{
  "constructor": {
    "foo": "bar
  }
}

While we should only throw if the constructor key has a direct prototype child.

{
  "constructor": {
    "prototype": {
      "foo": "bar
    }
  }
}

I'm still checking if there are some edge cases that need to be covered, or if this change will introduce any regression.

Checklist

@delvedor delvedor marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2021 07:05
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Member

@jsumners jsumners left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Copy link
Member Author

@delvedor delvedor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fastify/core I'm wondering if we should remove the whole constructor object or only the constructor.prototype:

delete node.constructor

What do you think?

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

I would remove also constructor. We can safely assume that anyone doing those things is an attacker.

@delvedor delvedor merged commit 26f64b6 into master Mar 15, 2021
@delvedor delvedor deleted the improve-contractor-detection branch March 15, 2021 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants