⚡️ Speed up sorter() by 4211531.56 in PR #1 (new-sorter)
#33
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![codeflash-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/413177?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
The function you provided, sorter, is already using Python's built-in sort function which has a time complexity of O(n log n), where n is a number of elements in the array. This is the fastest achievable sorting complexity for comparison-based sorts.
However, if you want to achieve a marginal speed increase, writing this in-place might help.
Here's an alternative version using list comprehension. Although this does not improve the time complexity, it gives a Pythonic touch:
```python
def sorter(arr):
return sorted(arr)
```
Again, this command returns a new sorted list and does not modify the original list. If you want to sort the list in-place, you only have the original function:
Please note that sorting time complexity cannot be improved further than O(n log n) using comparison-based sorting algorithms. To really optimize this function, you would need a guarantee about the content of your data, for example, if your array only contained integers in a particular range, then you could use counting sort or radix sort, which can have a time complexity of O(n).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
new-sorter.📄
sorter()incode_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py📈 Performance went up by
4211531.56(42115.32faster)⏱️ Runtime went down from
1070554.63μsto25.42μsExplanation and details
(click to show)
The function you provided, sorter, is already using Python's built-in sort function which has a time complexity of O(n log n), where n is a number of elements in the array. This is the fastest achievable sorting complexity for comparison-based sorts.
However, if you want to achieve a marginal speed increase, writing this in-place might help.
Here's an alternative version using list comprehension. Although this does not improve the time complexity, it gives a Pythonic touch:
Again, this command returns a new sorted list and does not modify the original list. If you want to sort the list in-place, you only have the original function:
Please note that sorting time complexity cannot be improved further than O(n log n) using comparison-based sorting algorithms. To really optimize this function, you would need a guarantee about the content of your data, for example, if your array only contained integers in a particular range, then you could use counting sort or radix sort, which can have a time complexity of O(n).
Correctness verification
The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below.
🔘 (none found) − ⚙️ Existing Unit Tests
✅ 3 Passed − 🌀 Generated Regression Tests
(click to show generated tests)
undefined