Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display resources from resource fork where format is known #7

Open
roughana opened this issue Feb 12, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Display resources from resource fork where format is known #7

roughana opened this issue Feb 12, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@roughana
Copy link

Viewing the resource fork of a file displays the resources in a generic way.
I would like to see the resources displayed in a way that best shows what the resource is.
e.g. given resType = 0x8029 - rVersion 00000000: 07 60 00 03 0f 00 ....
Display as "3.0b7" like the Finder would with OA-I

This can be in addition to the generic way - perhaps with a button that pops up a window to display the resource.

@fadden
Copy link
Owner

fadden commented Feb 12, 2015

FWIW, this is on the "requested features" list in two places:

  • Add: ResEdit-style resource viewer.
  • Make rVersion and rComment resources more easily visible, perhaps treating them in a fashion similar to NuFX comments.

@roughana
Copy link
Author

ok, thanks for the reminder that there's a long list of requests. :-)
From: Andy McFadden [email protected]
To: fadden/ciderpress [email protected]
Cc: roughana [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2015, 16:54
Subject: Re: [ciderpress] Display resources from resource fork where format is known (#7)

FWIW, this is on the "requested features" list in two places:

  • Add: ResEdit-style resource viewer.
  • Make rVersion and rComment resources more easily visible, perhaps treating them in a fashion similar to NuFX comments.

    Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants