Enlarge exemption limit #97
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…d to be extended to the next power of two
|
(Clippy failing is not due to the changes induced by this PR, but I can make it go green here if needed) |
|
Thank you! Looks good to me. I'll fix the clippy issue in a separate commit. |
irakliyk
approved these changes
Jun 18, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This (tiny) PR increases the transition constraint exemption limit in
AirContextby one.I believe that in some cases, the current limit may be a problem (for instance a trace where the 2^k rows are necessary, which then needs to be extended to the next power of two 2^{k+1}). In such cases, the current limit won't be sufficient, because the last evaluation frame to be checked on the proving side will overlap between the actual trace and the dummy values.