Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update RulesOfHooks with useEvent rules #25285
Update RulesOfHooks with useEvent rules #25285
Changes from 2 commits
ec0e8e8
9804d1a
16e669b
9550edb
76c096c
54765ee
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: shall we just call this "event functions" like the doc (https://beta.reactjs.org/learn/separating-events-from-effects)? It's conciser and feels first classy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure what exactly we want to call it (after all the recent bikeshedding) since
useEvent
might be renamed, hence why I've been avoiding giving it a name. Maybe @acdlite can weigh in on what to call it in the meantime?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we think of any case where we'd need to go deeper or recurse? I think the only valid one I can come up with is
{ }
blocks that aren't conditional. Is there more?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think one generalized case where we might need to go deeper is if the event function is reassigned to a variable instead of being initialized in a variable declaration:
But I don't know if this is something we want to support? I may have misunderstood the overall goal of the lint rules: do we aim to be correct in all cases, or only in the "idiomatic" case with some small exceptions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea this is not worth supporting. I think only idiomatic usage is relevant, and I guess people don't use raw blocks much either.