Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove transform file .js restriction for testUtils #308

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2019
Merged

Remove transform file .js restriction for testUtils #308

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2019

Conversation

pengx17
Copy link
Contributor

@pengx17 pengx17 commented Feb 27, 2019

Since we are able to write transformers in TS, the .js extension hard coded in testUtils not allow us to use it to write tests for TS transform modules.
And require('some-module') will automatically infer some-module's extension whether it is ended with '.js' or '.ts', it should be safe to remove ',js'.

Since we are able to write transformers in TS, the .js extension hard coded in testUtils not allow us to use it to write tests for TS transform modules.
And `require('some-module')` will automatically infer some-module's extension whether it is ended with '.js' or '.ts', it should be safe to remove ',js'.
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need the corporate CLA signed.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks!

@fkling
Copy link
Contributor

fkling commented Mar 6, 2019

Seems reasonable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants