Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: mention ttypescript, a common integration #379

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022

Conversation

agilgur5
Copy link
Collaborator

@agilgur5 agilgur5 commented Jul 10, 2022

Summary

Mention ttypescript under the typescript option in the docs

Details

  • ttypescript is commonly used for transformers and is referenced various times in the issues
    • so add it to the docs for searchability
  • ttypescript itself mentions this option in its docs for integrating with Rollup/rpt2

- `ttypescript` is commonly used for `transformers` and is referenced various times in the issues
  - so add it to the docs for searchability
@agilgur5 agilgur5 added scope: integration Related to an integration, not necessarily to core (but could influence core) scope: docs Documentation could be improved. Or changes that only affect docs kind: internal Changes only affect the internals, and _not_ the public API or external-facing docs labels Jul 10, 2022
@ezolenko ezolenko merged commit 9e7adaa into ezolenko:master Jul 12, 2022
@agilgur5 agilgur5 added kind: dx Improvements to dev experience, e.g. error messages, logging, external-facing docs, etc and removed kind: internal Changes only affect the internals, and _not_ the public API or external-facing docs labels Jul 22, 2022
@agilgur5 agilgur5 deleted the docs-ttypescript branch July 2, 2023 21:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: dx Improvements to dev experience, e.g. error messages, logging, external-facing docs, etc scope: docs Documentation could be improved. Or changes that only affect docs scope: integration Related to an integration, not necessarily to core (but could influence core)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants