Styleguide #262
Labels
configuration
Settings! Templates! (Thought it already existed tho....??)
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
legacy
The oldest content.
meta
Involving THE PSALMS and/or this repo
migration
Movin'.
refinement
Making things pretty.
==(This issue should have been created several months ago??)==
⸎ David Blue Styleguide ⸎
Saturday, July 31, 2021 9:00:48 PM
David Blue's personal style guide across writing, social posts, etc.
In a desire to quantify/document my own personal preferences in composition, I have contemplated writing a style guide like this for a very long time.
⸎ Footnotes and Endnotes come after both punctuation and quotation marks.
spelling
"WiFi"
“sortof”
“featureset”
“Web Site”
Do Not
"I'd be remiss..."
"Really struck me."
"At the end of the day..."
"When it's all said and done..."
"In the final hour..."
"Out of all the __, __ really stood out to me..."
"In my book..."
"In my estimation..."
All idioms.
All platitudes.
The “tldr” school of thought.
I will write what I have not read.
Scribam Quid Non Legerim
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Here’s what I know: the worthwhile publications have not been crucified on the Cross of “Readability,” the genre-busting song talent has not been given up in the face of the streaming service-afflicted music industry.
Extratone's Styleguide in Full
Extratone Style Guide
This Style Guide exists for the purposes of both technical and editorial reference for internal and external use when composing, editing, citing, quoting, capturing, or otherwise manipulating or displaying any/all Extratone content.
Editorially
As an independent, youth-oriented publication it is both our privilege and our duty to seek out innovative methods of communication. In written composition, this means all possible avoidance of unnecessary cliche and/or overused terms (for instance: use of the term “struck” in a metaphor - e.g. what struck me) except where they are critically portrayed. It is essential to remember that the English language is no more than a tool for our use, and grammar should not be revered as an immalleable, Holy absolute which we must venerate and obey. Rather, it should be irreverently and liberally manipulated to perform as desired. Grammar should never be an obstacle or burden ****in our writing or editing, and should always be discarded in favor of innovative and/or contextual verse.
In general, we write, speak, and publish under the assumption of an intelligent, discerning audience, meaning that we are unafraid of traversing obscure, unusual, or extraordinary detail (technical or otherwise,) that we do not patronize beyond the reasonable ability of a modern reader’s search engine, and especially that we format copy independently of common web standard “readability.” Our vocabulary and syntax are diverse (though we do not sacrifice undue time to unearthing bizarre, senseless synonyms,) fluid, and occasionally difficult, but written as such for the purpose of colorful, substantial delivery in acknowledgement of the vast resources instantly available to the modern reader. In other words: do not tell what can simply and easily be looked up. With search engines as they are, this is a quickly verifiable/quantifiable factor with a given definition, summary, or abstract. If a writer is in conflict regarding the redundancy of a given bit of information, they can painlessly search for it themselves and observe the same results as the reader would within milliseconds to observe what would and would not be immediately evident. Not only is this approach respectful of the readership’s intellect, it is also a comparatively democratic means of regarding information.
Specifics of Note
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: