Docs for new spacy-trf architectures

[svlandeg]

This PR should not be merged until spacy-transformers 1.1.0 is out. Keeping in draft until then.

Description

• docs for spacy-transformers#268 & spacy-transformers#287
• bump spacy-transformers to 1.1.0

This PR also updates the quickstart with the v2 model. I guess this can go wrong if people upgrade spacy but not spacy-transformers - they'd end up with an architecture that won't be available. Not sure how to avoid that though, it also seems unfortunate to keep recommending an older architecture in the quickstart.

Types of change

docs update

Checklist

• I have submitted the spaCy Contributor Agreement.
• I ran the tests, and all new and existing tests passed.
• My changes don't require a change to the documentation, or if they do, I've added all required information.

[adrianeboyd]

Should spacy-transformers.Tok2VecTransformer.v1 get added to the legacy page?

[svlandeg]

@adrianeboyd : we discussed this on Slack and I thought the decision was not to move them to legacy as the backoff only handles spacy.? Anyway we probably do want to find a solution for this if we accumulate too many legacy architectures here.

EDIT: or did you mean only to the docs legacy page, not the actual legacy package?

[adrianeboyd]

I mean the legacy page in the docs, not spacy-legacy.

[svlandeg]

Yea, hm. I thought about that, but decided not to because the title reads "Archived implementations available through spacy-legacy" :/

[adrianeboyd]

Hmm, I didn't realize that. Maybe then leave it documented on the transformer page? It seems bad that the v1 documentation is completely gone.

[adrianeboyd]

There is a similar problem for the ModelOutput changes, how to document both versions of the TransformerData and FullTransformerBatch dataclasses.

[svlandeg]

The v1 docs aren't completely gone though, there are two Accordion sections which state they are the same, minus the transformer_config argument, so I guess I was hoping that was sufficient :p

[adrianeboyd]

Ah, I see. As long you as can actually find and see that using the site search (which honestly isn't working very well for me these days), then I think it's fine.