chore!: move sequencers to pkg #2931
Conversation
|
The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow CI / buf-check (pull_request).
|
|
Claude finished @tac0turtle's task in 4m 24s —— View job Code Review CompleteI've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that moves the sequencers package to SummaryThis PR successfully moves sequencer implementations from Detailed Review✅ Code Quality & ArchitectureStrengths:
Documentation Updates:
Build Configuration:
Other Changes:
🔍 Issues Found1. Documentation Inconsistency in CLAUDE.md The PR updates Line 53 (CLAUDE.md:53): - **Executor** (`core/executor.go`) - Handles state transitionsIssue: The path Verification: $ ls core/execution/execution.go
core/execution/execution.go # ✅ EXISTS
$ grep "type Executor interface" core/execution/execution.go
type Executor interface { # ✅ CORRECT NAMERecommended Fix: - **Executor** (`core/executor.go`) - Handles state transitions
+ **Executor** (`core/execution/execution.go`) - Handles state transitionsNote: The other updated references in CLAUDE.md appear correct:
These documentation issues appear to have been introduced in the same commit (69e52f6) alongside the sequencers move, but are unrelated to the sequencers refactoring itself. 🧪 Testing & ReliabilityStrengths:
Test Coverage Verification: 📋 Additional Observations1. Breaking Change Label
The breaking change marker may be overly cautious unless there are external consumers importing these packages directly (unlikely for a rollup framework's internal sequencer implementations). 2. Merge Conflict Risk ✅
3. File Organization ✅
🔐 Security ConsiderationsNo security concerns identified:
⚡ Performance ConsiderationsNo performance impact:
Recommendations
ConclusionThis is a well-executed structural refactoring with:
The only issue is a minor documentation inconsistency in Approval Status: ✅ Approved with minor documentation fix suggested |
Summary of ChangesHello @tac0turtle, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request undertakes a structural refactoring by relocating the sequencer-related modules into a dedicated Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the project structure by moving the sequencer implementations into the pkg directory, which is a good change for improving code organization. The changes are mostly mechanical, involving file moves and updates to import paths and documentation. These have been done correctly and consistently across the codebase. I've found one minor issue in the documentation that could be addressed to improve clarity for developers.
CLAUDE.md
Outdated
| - **Executor** (core/executor.go) - Handles state transitions | ||
| - **Sequencer** (core/sequencer.go) - Orders transactions | ||
| - **DA** (core/da.go) - Data availability layer abstraction | ||
| - **Execution** (`core/execution/execution.go`) - State transition interface and types |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seems to be a typo in the documentation for the Execution component. The interface defined in core/execution/execution.go is named Executor, but it's documented here as Execution. To avoid confusion for developers, this should be corrected to Executor.
| - **Execution** (`core/execution/execution.go`) - State transition interface and types | |
| - **Executor** (`core/execution/execution.go`) - State transition interface and types |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2931 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 60.14% 60.14%
=======================================
Files 88 88
Lines 8427 8427
=======================================
Hits 5068 5068
Misses 2787 2787
Partials 572 572
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
The changes look good. Please don't merge now to avoid conflicts |
yes will hold off, this isnt high priority |
Overview
This pr moves sequencers to pkg, its a nit, we should probably hold off on merging to avoid lots merge conflicts with da removal