Phoenix Hard-fork to occur at the same block as Aztlan - to "fix it"#261
Conversation
…an was set, and link to Wei's recommendations on "Atzlan fix".
sorpaas
left a comment
sorpaas
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this ECIP is merge-able, I want to point out that there is not enough time to implement Aztlan-fix on the same block as Aztlan. We've just had several design flaws in ECIP-1061 because the proper ECIP process was bypassed, and also because there were not sufficient time for reviews. Phoenix definitely needs to learn those lessons from Aztlan and give sufficient time for reviews and testing.
Also a small note that this together with #263 is conflicting with #221 vs #224, but this won't be an issue with the current active ECIP process.
|
ECIP Editors: @soc1c @YazzyYaz @meowsbits @sorpaas @BelfordZ: |
…tion to the reference and thanks higher up.
|
@sorpaas Is this blocked from merging purely on your review? Please can you unblock and merge please? Thank you. |
…m earlier ECIP. The language was inappropriate in this example.
|
@sorpaas Copyright language corrected. This good now? |
4 participants
No description provided.