Meta Meta Specification for Forking Meta ECIPs (Use Pull Requests version)#223
Closed
meowsbits wants to merge 6 commits into
Closed
Meta Meta Specification for Forking Meta ECIPs (Use Pull Requests version)#223meowsbits wants to merge 6 commits into
meowsbits wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
shanejonas
reviewed
Nov 30, 2019
| A Forking Meta ECIP may only achieve `Last Call` status once a Changeset has been accepted and all other alternative marked as `Deferred`, `Withdrawn`, or `Rejected`. | ||
|
|
||
| Procedurally, compared to the historical and traditional practice of opening an essentially empty Forking Meta ECIP and working to fill in blanks, this proposed procedure makes only marginal and changes, demanding only that what was taken as implication, subtext, or conteext before now be made explicit. Rather than reviewing actual-or-theoretical proposed change sets to an ECIP (which sadly, have historically usually been theoretical), this forces proposed Forking Meta ECIP alternative outcomes to assume a fully qualified and standardized formats before becoming eligible for consideration. | ||
| This proposed procedure makes only marginal and changes, demanding only that what was taken as implication, subtext, or conteext before now be made explicit. Rather than reviewing actual-or-theoretical proposed changesets to an ECIP (which sadly, have historically usually been theoretical), this forces proposed Forking Meta ECIP alternative outcomes to assume a fully qualified and standardized formats before becoming eligible for consideration. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| This proposed procedure makes only marginal and changes, demanding only that what was taken as implication, subtext, or conteext before now be made explicit. Rather than reviewing actual-or-theoretical proposed changesets to an ECIP (which sadly, have historically usually been theoretical), this forces proposed Forking Meta ECIP alternative outcomes to assume a fully qualified and standardized formats before becoming eligible for consideration. | |
| This proposed procedure makes only marginal and changes, demanding only that what was taken as implication, subtext, or context before now be made explicit. Rather than reviewing actual-or-theoretical proposed changesets to an ECIP (which sadly, have historically usually been theoretical), this forces proposed Forking Meta ECIP alternative outcomes to assume a fully qualified and standardized formats before becoming eligible for consideration. |
sorpaas
reviewed
Nov 30, 2019
| ### Abstract | ||
|
|
||
| Forking Meta ECIPs (defined as Meta ECIPs specifying any Standards-Core track ECIP and an activation block number) should be complete and unique. | ||
| Forking Meta ECIPs (defined as Meta ECIPs _intended_ to specify any Standards-Core track ECIP and an activation block number) should contain only placeholder information |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can actually give "Forking Meta ECIPs" a new category. A lot of people have pointed out that hard fork ECIPs does not nicely fit in "meta" category.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Interesting idea. Have taken a first swing at this with #224.
Member
Author
|
Last 4 commits were mess-ups. Wrong branch. Ooops. |
Member
Author
|
Closing because I prefer #224. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Alternative to #222, here proposing using Changesets (eg Pull Requests) against a shell Forking Meta ECIP as a procedural pattern, as opposed to using distinct ECIP documents.
Builds on, conceptually includes, and is intended to supersede #221.