Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 103 Agenda #232

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 10 comments
Closed

Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 103 Agenda #232

timbeiko opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 10 comments

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Dec 11, 2020

Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 103 Agenda

Agenda

  1. YOLOv3 & Berlin client updates
  2. Other EIPs or discussion items

Next Call: January 22, 2021 14:00 UTC

@moodysalem
Copy link

Could you add discussion of EIP-3171 to the agenda? I can present it. ethereum/EIPs#3171

@shamatar
Copy link

Would it be possible to finally get results of gas performance of EVM384? Even while BLS12-381 was postponed now it doesn’t cancel the fact that more crypto primitives are required

@GabrielHumus
Copy link

I assume it is widely understood that the protocols for the top layer should not be adequately encrypted by the transfer/network protocol. If Snappy is able to add to or not compress data, it does not matter if the upper layer is correctly encrypted.
...........................................................................................................
Regards https://fahadkhan.pk

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented Jan 4, 2021

@moodysalem @shamatar added 👍

@moodysalem
Copy link

@moodysalem @shamatar added 👍

Have since found a good workaround thanks to discussion and don't think the EIP is worth presenting anymore

@technicallyty
Copy link

Can we add EIP-2937 to the agenda? @astarinmymind and I would like to present it. EIP-2937 // our PR on EIP-2937

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented Jan 5, 2021

@moodysalem removed, @technicallyty added!

@shamatar
Copy link

shamatar commented Jan 8, 2021

Forgot to set a usual remainder: as was mentioned during last few calls EIP-2666 is ready, it was tested on existing clients, formulas are safe, etc. I would even expect that some clients may have got improvements since then.

Also, as secp256k1 now uses GLV multiplication with 30-40% speed boost, it may be good to later on reprice ECRecover

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented Jan 8, 2021

Closed in favor of #237

@FittEyes
Copy link

FittEyes commented Apr 9, 2022

I was thinking about CpfP, which makes little sense for Ethereum. Except in the case of simple contracts where the gas can be easily (and cheaply) calculated or guessed by the miners.

However, for most users, the ability to increase fees later makes more sense. RBF that only increases fees makes more sense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants