Skip to content

Conversation

Meyanis95
Copy link
Collaborator

Adding an approach for private bonds.

@Meyanis95 Meyanis95 requested review from mojalil, namnc and oskarth October 8, 2025 15:36

### Recommended Architecture: ERC-3643 + Privacy Extensions

**Primary Pattern:** [ERC-3643 T-REX protocol](https://docs.erc3643.org/erc-3643) + [Shielded transfers](../patterns/pattern-shielding.md)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we mentino this as a pattern?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point!
We already have ERC-7573 as a pattern, so it would make sense to get that one as well.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ERC-7573 as a pattern added ✅

ERC-3643 provides the regulatory compliance framework for tokenized securities, while privacy extensions enable confidential transfers:

- **Identity Layer:** ERC-3643's ONCHAINID system handles KYC/eligibility verification
- **Transfer Rules:** Compliance checks (investor accreditation, transfer restrictions) remain transparent
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do we mean by checks being transparent? The rules of them?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not the rules, but the result of the compliance check is public.

@Meyanis95 Meyanis95 merged commit 3a8abb8 into master Oct 13, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants