-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.9k
eth/protocols/eth: drop protocol version eth/68 #33511
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5374a8e
drop eth68
healthykim b2ac1c8
drop buffer
healthykim 0d34003
fix error
healthykim 31b5d5a
eth/protocols/eth: bring back Derivable method
fjl dddcb3c
eth/protocols/eth: remove use of ReceiptsRLPPacket in test
fjl 3cf8e99
eth/protocols/eth: remove ReceiptsRLPPacket
fjl 059f1f0
eth/downloader: improve receipt test logic
fjl bf3ff64
eth/protocols/eth: put back original name of blockReceiptsToNetwork
fjl c0ebb35
eth/protocols/eth: remove unused variable in test
fjl cf9a022
eth/protocols/eth: simplify testGetBlockReceipts again
fjl c8e956d
eth/downloader: remove version from test names and remove multi-versi…
fjl 3348638
eth/protocols/eth: unexport encodeForHash
fjl 98a5a26
eth/protocols/eth: put back fast decoder for hashing
fjl ca0c5b9
eth/protocols/eth: move EncodeForStorage below constructor
fjl b47dda0
eth/protocols/eth: use Derivable in test
fjl c3919a8
eth/protocols/eth: inline writeReceiptForHash into Derivable
fjl 3c9f4ac
eth/protocols/eth: fix function name in test
fjl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed this because the purpose of this test was checking how sync behaves with peers which have different protocol versions. However, the test was only using one peer, and it was now labeled as "peer 68" but used eth/69. Best to just remove it.