Skip to content

chore(deps,ci): bump action-lint version to support case#2308

Merged
danceratopz merged 3 commits intoethereum:forks/amsterdamfrom
kevaundray:kw/update-action-lint
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

chore(deps,ci): bump action-lint version to support case#2308
danceratopz merged 3 commits intoethereum:forks/amsterdamfrom
kevaundray:kw/update-action-lint

Conversation

@kevaundray
Copy link
Contributor

@kevaundray kevaundray commented Feb 24, 2026

🗒️ Description

Pretty low priority. Feel free to close if leaning against updating deps.

This is a small followup from #2304 (comment)

The current version of actionlint is 1.7.10 which does not support the case function. This updates it to 1.7.11 where it was added.

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

✅ Checklist

  • All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:
    uvx tox -e static
  • All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
  • All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
  • All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).

Cute Animal Picture

🐚

@kevaundray kevaundray marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2026 23:39
@marioevz marioevz requested a review from SamWilsn February 24, 2026 23:46
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 25, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.91%. Comparing base (8cb6576) to head (62d8e2b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           forks/amsterdam    #2308   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            84.91%   84.91%           
================================================
  Files                  599      599           
  Lines                36943    36943           
  Branches              3818     3818           
================================================
  Hits                 31370    31370           
  Misses                4942     4942           
  Partials               631      631           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 84.91% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@SamWilsn SamWilsn requested a review from danceratopz February 25, 2026 20:22
@SamWilsn SamWilsn assigned danceratopz and unassigned SamWilsn Feb 25, 2026
@SamWilsn
Copy link
Contributor

Reassigning because I don't know anything about actionlint, and git blame suggests Dan does.

@danceratopz danceratopz added C-chore Category: chore A-deps Area: Dependencies—Stuff we build on top of (eg. `uv.lock`, `pyproject.toml`) A-ci Area: Continuous Integration labels Feb 27, 2026
@danceratopz danceratopz changed the title chore(ci): update action-lint chore(deps,ci): bump action-lint version to support case Feb 27, 2026
Copy link
Member

@danceratopz danceratopz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kevaundray! LGTM.

@danceratopz danceratopz force-pushed the kw/update-action-lint branch from 2437060 to 62d8e2b Compare March 2, 2026 11:06
@danceratopz
Copy link
Member

Rebased on forks/amsterdam to grab latest CI changes.

@danceratopz danceratopz merged commit 7219c3b into ethereum:forks/amsterdam Mar 2, 2026
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-ci Area: Continuous Integration A-deps Area: Dependencies—Stuff we build on top of (eg. `uv.lock`, `pyproject.toml`) C-chore Category: chore

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants