Skip to content

feat(test): performance and fill updates; print -> debug log session finish#2150

Merged
fselmo merged 1 commit intoforks/amsterdamfrom
experiments/benchmark-releases
Feb 9, 2026
Merged

feat(test): performance and fill updates; print -> debug log session finish#2150
fselmo merged 1 commit intoforks/amsterdamfrom
experiments/benchmark-releases

Conversation

@fselmo
Copy link
Contributor

@fselmo fselmo commented Feb 5, 2026

🗒️ Description

  • Cache gas spent for recently problematic test
  • Silence prints for fill as debug logs, turn this on for releases so we can debug issues better
  • Increase --durations to 100 for releases

✅ Checklist

  • All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:
    uvx tox -e static
  • All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
  • All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
  • All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).

Cute Animal Picture

Screenshot 2026-02-05 at 13 30 11

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.07%. Comparing base (b206688) to head (fd56fc8).
⚠️ Report is 14 commits behind head on forks/amsterdam.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           forks/amsterdam    #2150   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            86.07%   86.07%           
================================================
  Files                  599      599           
  Lines                39472    39472           
  Branches              3780     3780           
================================================
  Hits                 33977    33977           
  Misses                4862     4862           
  Partials               633      633           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 86.07% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@fselmo fselmo force-pushed the experiments/benchmark-releases branch 2 times, most recently from 37faf0b to 9c1e1c3 Compare February 5, 2026 23:44
Copy link
Member

@marioevz marioevz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, just one comment.

@fselmo fselmo force-pushed the experiments/benchmark-releases branch from 9c1e1c3 to fd56fc8 Compare February 9, 2026 18:40
Copy link
Member

@marioevz marioevz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@fselmo fselmo merged commit 402b3d0 into forks/amsterdam Feb 9, 2026
15 checks passed
@fselmo fselmo deleted the experiments/benchmark-releases branch February 9, 2026 18:51
RazorClient pushed a commit to RazorClient/execution-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2026
…ent (ethereum#2150)

* feat(pre_alloc): Add maximum bytecode size limit for contract deployment

* refactor(benchmark): resolve contract size limit failing cases

* feat(pre_alloc): integrate fork dependency for dynamic bytecode size limit

* refactor: remove hardcoded value
RazorClient pushed a commit to RazorClient/execution-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2026
…ent (ethereum#2150)

* feat(pre_alloc): Add maximum bytecode size limit for contract deployment

* refactor(benchmark): resolve contract size limit failing cases

* feat(pre_alloc): integrate fork dependency for dynamic bytecode size limit

* refactor: remove hardcoded value
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants