Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 5, 2024. It is now read-only.

Constantinople#1246

Merged
zilm13 merged 26 commits intodevelopfrom
constantinople
Dec 26, 2018
Merged

Constantinople#1246
zilm13 merged 26 commits intodevelopfrom
constantinople

Conversation

@zilm13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@zilm13 zilm13 commented Dec 24, 2018

Ready to schedule Constantinople fork on MainNet:

  • Tck tests commit bumped to the latest one, all failed tests fixed
  • added and passed all existing Tck tests related to Constantinople
  • MainNet config updated to enable Constantinople according to EIP-1013

Review me!

zilm13 added 23 commits October 15, 2018 15:36
@zilm13 zilm13 requested a review from mkalinin December 24, 2018 17:31
@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coveralls commented Dec 24, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 57.038% when pulling 444e8dc on constantinople into 602ca25 on develop.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mkalinin mkalinin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zilm13 great job! 👍

Repository originalRepo = track;
// removes address in main track copy if the same address already exists
// TCK test case only - normally this is near-impossible situation in the real network
if (cacheTrack.hasContractDetails(newContractAddress)) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't this call always return true?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And could you please share more details about the case which this workaround is made for?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@zilm13 zilm13 Dec 26, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't this call always return true?

Looks like you are right from the implementation.
But as we have such interface method for checking and as implementations could change in future, I'd keep this.

@zilm13 zilm13 merged commit b7d13a2 into develop Dec 26, 2018
@zilm13 zilm13 deleted the constantinople branch December 26, 2018 08:37
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants