Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Whiteblock Genesis Under Testing Tools #61

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 13, 2019
Merged

Conversation

zscole
Copy link
Contributor

@zscole zscole commented May 8, 2019

Added Whiteblock Genesis (open source software) under testing tools section.

Zak Cole added 2 commits May 8, 2019 14:05
Added Whiteblock Genesis (open source software) under testing tools section.
i had the GSpot chrome extension enabled. lol
@jjmstark jjmstark requested a review from maurelian May 9, 2019 16:06
@maurelian
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like whiteblock would be a valuable tool for consortia etc. operating private/permissioned networks.

@jjmstark is that in scope?

@zscole am I wrong?

@jjmstark
Copy link
Contributor

@maurelian Yes, I think that is in scope.

If in the future there are many tools aimed at the "consortia" use-case, we might want to create a specific section for them in /Build.

@zscole
Copy link
Contributor Author

zscole commented May 10, 2019

Seems like whiteblock would be a valuable tool for consortia etc. operating private/permissioned networks.

@jjmstark is that in scope?

@zscole am I wrong?

Yes, I believe that's a potential use case as well, but we provide explicit support for a multitude of Ethereum-based clients and protocols. It's really just a blockchain specific development and testing framework and quite a few Ethereum projects are using it now.

@maurelian maurelian merged commit 04f5ec5 into ethereum:master May 13, 2019
TylerAPfledderer pushed a commit to TylerAPfledderer/ethereum-org-website that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants