Skip to content

update: developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/block-proposal content#16693

Closed
rahimira2 wants to merge 1 commit into
ethereum:devfrom
rahimira2:patch-4
Closed

update: developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/block-proposal content#16693
rahimira2 wants to merge 1 commit into
ethereum:devfrom
rahimira2:patch-4

Conversation

@rahimira2
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

Related Issue

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for ethereumorg ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e1ea23e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/ethereumorg/deploys/692565e30e10360008b5b113
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-16693--ethereumorg.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
7 paths audited
Performance: 48 (🔴 down 11 from production)
Accessibility: 94 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (🔴 down 7 from production)
SEO: 91 (no change from production)
PWA: 59 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the content 🖋️ This involves copy additions or edits label Nov 25, 2025
@corwintines
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

corwintines commented Nov 27, 2025

Any reason for this big rewrite @rahimira2? On a quick skim, this looks like the same content just reformatted more or less.

This would have large implications on the translations so I don't want to bring in without hearing your reason for rewriting first.

@mnelsonBT would also be curious what you think about this.

@mnelsonBT
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Any reason for this big rewrite @rahimira2? On a quick skim, this looks like the same content just reformatted more or less.

This would have large implications on the translations so I don't want to bring in without hearing your reason for rewriting first.

@mnelsonBT would also be curious what you think about this.

Thanks @corwintines - appreciate you calling out the translation considerations for updating this documentation.

Some of these edits do help improve the page's clarity and format (for ex. I think it's great to add the bulleted list of resources under Prerequisites). I agree with you though that keeping these foundational docs translate-able is top priority.
Some changes will be more difficult to translate out of English; removing non-technical descriptors to achieve brevity also removes the context that helps technical jargon translate. A few of these edits also remove background context that is helpful to provide in this "Foundational topics" non-advanced docs section.

Any info you have here on rationale/goals would be helpful @rahimira2 , thanks!

I can review to suggest changes on a few spots where it would be helpful to bring back original context or language. It would be helpful to have your feedback/goals in mind when doing so.

@wackerow wackerow changed the title Update index.md update: developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/block-proposal content Dec 5, 2025
@corwintines
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Just a bump on this @rahimira2

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Jan 8, 2026

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Status: Stale This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. label Jan 8, 2026
@wackerow wackerow added low priority This has a low priority and removed Status: Stale This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. labels Jan 16, 2026
@wackerow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rahimira2 Do me a favor and fill in the PR description with the goals of this update, thanks!

@wackerow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

wackerow commented Feb 5, 2026

Closing out as stale pending requested information

@wackerow wackerow closed this Feb 5, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the abandoned This has been abandoned or will not be implemented label Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

abandoned This has been abandoned or will not be implemented content 🖋️ This involves copy additions or edits low priority This has a low priority

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants