Skip to content

docs: Update Plural Funding link #16291

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
wackerow merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2025
Merged

docs: Update Plural Funding link #16291

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion public/content/zero-knowledge-proofs/index.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Defined as “coordinating to limit open competition by deceiving, defrauding, a

Bribery and collusion limit the effectiveness of any process that uses voting as a signaling mechanism (especially where users can prove how they voted). This can have significant consequences, especially where the votes are responsible for allocating scarce resources.

For example, [quadratic funding mechanisms](https://www.radicalxchange.org/concepts/plural-funding/) rely on donations to measure preference for certain options among different public good projects. Each donation counts as a "vote" for a specific project, with projects that receive more votes getting more funds from the matching pool.
For example, [quadratic funding mechanisms](https://www.radicalxchange.org/wiki/plural-funding/) rely on donations to measure preference for certain options among different public good projects. Each donation counts as a "vote" for a specific project, with projects that receive more votes getting more funds from the matching pool.

Using onchain voting makes quadratic funding susceptible to collusion: blockchain transactions are public, so bribers can inspect a bribee’s onchain activity to see how they “voted”. This way quadratic funding ceases to be an effective means for allocating funds based on the aggregated preferences of the community.

Expand Down