Added Restaking page in usecases#15400
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for ethereumorg ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Hi @YashIIT0909, what is the status with this PR? I see deploy failed. Do you need help to finish this? |
Hi @konopkja, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@YashIIT0909 I think there are several files causing issues here that were committed, can you remove:
- yarn.lock changes
- .yarnrc.yaml
- .yarn/install-state.gz
There is probably a version change in the yarn.lock causing the docsearch error, but we shouldnt be committing any of these yarn files you have in this PR
|
To be clear, the yarn.lock file should stay in, but your changes to it should be removed as there were no package changes in package.json |
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mnelsonBT <74370515+mnelsonBT@users.noreply.github.com>
@mnelsonBT this EigenLayer advertisement ok in your opinion? |
|
…entation and update image path for eigenLayer logo
| | Earn ETH rewards | Earn ETH Rewards + AVS rewards | | ||
| | Secures the Ethereum network | Secures the Ethereum network + AVSs | | ||
| |No minimum ETH | No minimum ETH | | ||
| |Low risk level | Low-to-medium risk level | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this should be low-to-high risk level. I don't think we can just assume medium for all AVS's.
| | Secures the Ethereum network | Secures the Ethereum network + AVSs | | ||
| |No minimum ETH | No minimum ETH | | ||
| |Low risk level | Low-to-medium risk level | | ||
| |Withdraw time depends on queue | Withdraw time depends on queue + unbonding period | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| |Withdraw time depends on queue | Withdraw time depends on queue + unbonding period | | |
| |Withdraw time depends on queue | Unbonding period + Withdraw time depends on queue | |
I think just change the order here as I believe the unbonding period has to happen first



Description
I have added new page "restaking" to the usecases
Related Issue