docs(proof): fixes consistency of abrevs, reduces verboseness, #13111
Closed
m4sterbunny wants to merge 5 commits into
Closed
docs(proof): fixes consistency of abrevs, reduces verboseness, #13111m4sterbunny wants to merge 5 commits into
m4sterbunny wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
m4sterbunny
requested review from
corwintines,
minimalsm,
nhsz,
pettinarip and
wackerow
as code owners
❌ Deploy Preview for ethereumorg failed. Why did it fail? →
|
Contributor
Author
|
closed in favour of #13200 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes consistency of abrevs, reduces verboseness, clarifies 3 clients
Description
Proofing rounds fixes p2p mixed with P2P
Applies more common variant Proof of Stake
Reduces verboseness
Clarifies 3rd client required for block building in intro
DOES NOT fix line 25: It seems unlikely to me that "Consensus clients include the execution payload in every block", do they need validator client to assist them to do this? I don't have the domain knowledge to add value here, but the position of this information is under "What does the execution client do?", therefore at minimum, relocation probably advised.
Related Issue