Skip to content

Conversation

@wisecameron
Copy link

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Dec 15, 2024

File ERCS/erc-7844.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @g11tech, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv

wisecameron and others added 2 commits December 17, 2024 13:37
Committing updated header

Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <[email protected]>
@wisecameron wisecameron changed the title Created ERC-XXXX: Consolidated Dynamic Storage (CDS) Created ERC-7844: Consolidated Dynamic Storage (CDS) Dec 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label Dec 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Dec 17, 2024
@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Created ERC-7844: Consolidated Dynamic Storage (CDS) Add ERC: Consolidated Dynamic Storage (CDS) Dec 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added w-ci and removed w-ci labels Dec 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added w-ci and removed w-ci labels Apr 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Few additional comments while you're working on this.

…umentation. Enhanced clarity on the capabilities and benefits of Consolidated Dynamic Storage, emphasizing its role as a comprehensive storage abstraction layer. Updated permission management table for improved structure and clarity. Changed SPDX license identifier in the CDSMinimal.sol file to CC0-1.0.
wisecameron and others added 4 commits July 3, 2025 03:56
…ved flowery language. Focused on communicating key points with more clarity.
…clarity and conciseness. Emphasize the role of CDS as a foundational storage primitive and its benefits in upgradeability and decentralization.
…ndancy and enhancing clarity and formatting.
Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added w-ci and removed w-ci labels Jul 3, 2025
@wisecameron
Copy link
Author

I have substantially improved the majority of the proposal - I also have a completely refactored rationale section in the works here. I really appreciate that you guys have let me put this on the backburner for some time -- I needed to step away for a while due to work constraints and just to cool off and let these ideas settle into a more cohesive whole.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2025

The commit f2f6e8e (as a parent of ce2bdae) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

Copy link
Contributor

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! Still need to remove the bold/italics from the UPPERCASE keywords, and move example code into a reference implementation section.

@wisecameron
Copy link
Author

Looking good! Still need to remove the bold/italics from the UPPERCASE keywords, and move example code into a reference implementation section.

Hey thank you man!

Update:
Been working at a very intense startup since May and haven't had as much time to work on this. I think it has quite a bit of unique merit but I need to simplify the outward image and build some interest around the concept - planning on building out a website, doing community building, and hosting some hackathons to build interest around it. Really pleased to see that the proposal hasn't been closed or anything, I 110% intend to get this moving, it's just quite a commitment to take interest from 0 to 1 and I need to be consistently dedicated to pull it off.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants