Skip to content

Conversation

@yaronvel
Copy link
Contributor

An interface for fractional reserve tokens.

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Sep 17, 2024

✅ All reviewers have approved.

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Fractional Reserve Token Standard Add ERC: Fractional Reserve Token Standard Sep 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label Sep 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Sep 17, 2024
@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Add ERC: Fractional Reserve Token Standard Add ERC: Fractional Reserve Token Sep 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label Sep 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Sep 17, 2024
yaronvel and others added 2 commits September 18, 2024 09:45
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label Sep 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Sep 18, 2024
@yaronvel
Copy link
Contributor Author

The html proofer (in the CI) does approve relative links, while the EIP walidator does not approve links that are not relative. is there anything i should do from my side?

ERCS/erc-7770.md Outdated
---
eip: 7770
title: Fractional Reserve Token
description: An interface for fractional reserve tokens.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your description just restates your title. Use the description to elaborate on the ideas introduced in your title instead. Perhaps explain what a fractional reserve token is?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yaronvel yaronvel May 11, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addressed in commit 78ec688

ERCS/erc-7770.md Outdated
## Abstract
We propose a new token standard for synthetic assets that are only partially redeemable to their underlying asset, but fully backed by other collateral assets.

The standard defines an interface to mint fractional reserve assets, and a standard to reflect economical risk related data to the token holders and lenders.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be "economic" instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed in commit 626d263

ERCS/erc-7770.md Outdated
This standard does not aim to dictate economic risk management practices, but rather to have a standard on how to reflect the risk to token holders.

## Specification
The proposed standard has the following requirements:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Proposals should be written as if they were already Final. Using "proposed" here would be weird once the standard is accepted.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed in a226c2f

ERCS/erc-7770.md Outdated
```
### Reserve ratio
The reserve ratio reflects the ratio between the token that is available as cash, i.e., available for an immediate redemption (or alternatively, a token that was not minted via a fractional reserve minting), and the total supply of the token. Segregated accounts **MUST** be subtracted from the cash balance.
Lower reserve ratio gives rise to higher capital efficiency, however it increases the **likelihood** of depeg or a run on the bank, where token holders cannot immediately redeem their synthetic token.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line feels more like rationale than specification?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed with 8a1d46b

ERCS/erc-7770.md Outdated
Comment on lines 76 to 77
Increasing the total supply could be a concern if a token is used for DAO votes and/or if dividends are distributed to token holders.
In order to mitigate such concerns, segregated accounts are introduced, with the premise that money in these accounts is not counted towards the reserve, and therefore, additional token supply cannot be minted against them.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These points feel more like security considerations or rationale?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed 1b3b81b

@github-actions
Copy link

There has been no activity on this issue for six months. It will be closed in 7 days if there is no new activity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review.

@yaronvel
Copy link
Contributor Author

yaronvel commented May 11, 2025

@SamWilsn thanks for the comments, and sorry for the delayed reply.
I addresses all you comments and it is now ready for review.

@github-actions github-actions bot added w-ci and removed w-stale labels May 11, 2025
ERCS/erc-7770.md Outdated

At the core of the coordination relies the need to understand how much additional supply is available for borrow, and at what interest rate. The additional borrowable supply is deduced from the required reserve ratio, and the total, borrowable and segregated supply.
Lower reserve ratio gives rise to higher capital efficiency, however it increases the **likelihood** of depeg or a run on the bank, where token holders cannot immediately redeem their synthetic token.
Hence, the interest rate **SHOULD** be monotonically increasing with the current reserve ratio.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requirements ("SHOULD") appear only in the Specification section. Instead, the rationale section should explain why those requirements exist.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed with commit 3720207d

SamWilsn
SamWilsn previously approved these changes Jul 18, 2025
@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) July 18, 2025 19:37
eip-review-bot
eip-review-bot previously approved these changes Jul 18, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@SamWilsn SamWilsn dismissed stale reviews from eip-review-bot and themself via cec3965 August 5, 2025 16:45
SamWilsn
SamWilsn previously approved these changes Aug 5, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

eip-review-bot
eip-review-bot previously approved these changes Aug 5, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2025

The commit cec3965 (as a parent of 3dbabf9) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@SamWilsn SamWilsn dismissed stale reviews from eip-review-bot and themself via cc25be2 August 21, 2025 18:24
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label Aug 21, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot merged commit bcd82eb into ethereum:master Aug 21, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants