Skip to content

Update ERC-7730: Added common keywords section to ERC-7730 #1321

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+3 −0
Draft

Update ERC-7730: Added common keywords section to ERC-7730 #1321

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions ERCS/erc-7730.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1380,6 +1380,9 @@ In the future, this specification could be extended to structured data like Meta

The `interpolatedIntent` field is particularly well-suited for [EIP-5792](./eip-5792.md) batch transactions, as it enables wallets to concatenate multiple operation descriptions into a single, natural language sentence. By joining individual `interpolatedIntent` strings with " and ", wallets can provide users with clear, readable summaries of complex multi-step operations like "Approve Uniswap Router to spend 1000 USDC and Swap 1000 USDC for at least 0.25 WETH". This significantly improves the user experience when reviewing batch transactions compared to displaying separate, disconnected operation descriptions. See the [Value Interpolation](#value-interpolation) section for detailed implementation guidance and examples.

### Common Keywords
The DeFi ecosystem has matured and has some repeating usecases with well defined terms for different actions. While this ERC does not define specific standards for DEX or Lending protocol intents, for the sake of easier user readibility, teams with similar products should align on similar terminology to describe actions and actors. We encourage the creation of another layer of standartization on top of ERC-7730 to be recommeneded and even enforced in clear signing registries for improved user security.
Copy link
Member

@kuzdogan kuzdogan Oct 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A real-world example would be helpful here IMO.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@arikg arikg Nov 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just generally adding a mention of dex swap interface or a full definition of what it would look like as a "standard". That would seem excessive to me in this ERC, as it's just a consideration


## Test Cases

More examples can be found in the asset folder [here](../assets/eip-7730/example-main.json) and [here](../assets/eip-7730/example-include.json).
Expand Down
Loading