Skip to content

Conversation

@MostafaS
Copy link
Contributor

@MostafaS MostafaS commented Jul 9, 2025

What

Adds a new ERC draft defining the Minimal Avatar Smart Wallet (MASW), a delegate‑wallet for EIP‑7702.

Files added

  • ERCS/eip-0.md
  • assets/eip-0/MASW.sol

Discussion

https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/erc-tbd-minimal-avatar-smart-wallet-masw-delegate-wallet-for-eip-7702/24761

Reference implementation

Relative link: MASW.sol

Checklist

  • Passes eipw
  • Uses CC0 licence line
  • Author field includes my GitHub handle

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Jul 9, 2025

✅ All reviewers have approved.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Jul 9, 2025
@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title ERC‑TBD: Minimal Avatar Smart Wallet (MASW) Add ERC: Minimal Avatar Smart Wallet (MASW) Jul 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added w-ci and removed w-ci labels Jul 9, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

The commit 44eae39 (as a parent of 684f50f) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@MostafaS
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @g11tech @SamWilsn @xinbenlv
I've fixed the CI issues and addressed Magicians feedback on compatibility. Ready for review? Happy to make changes.

Copy link
Contributor

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So just to confirm, the idea is that anyone can implement their own MASW and deploy it, and because all MASW implementations share the same interface, the off-chain part of wallets can interop smoothly?

@MostafaS
Copy link
Contributor Author

So just to confirm, the idea is that anyone can implement their own MASW and deploy it, and because all MASW implementations share the same interface, the off-chain part of wallets can interop smoothly?

Hi, yes, exactly. As long as the chain the wallet interacts with supports post-pectra changes (eip-7702) , the wallet interactions will be smooth.

@MostafaS
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @SamWilsn @xinbenlv @g11tech,

This PR has been ready for review for a while now. The Auto Review Bot is requesting an approval from one of you to move forward.

@SamWilsn - thank you for your earlier feedback in August! I addressed all your comments. Would you be able to give this an official approval review?

I'd really appreciate any feedback or approval so we can move this ERC forward.

Thank you!

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) November 21, 2025 17:51
Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot merged commit 0119363 into ethereum:master Nov 21, 2025
10 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants