Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions EIPS/eip-7691.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ title: Blob throughput increase
description: Increase the number of blobs to reach a new target and max of 6 and 9 blobs per block respectively
author: Parithosh Jayanthi (@parithosh), Toni Wahrstätter (@nerolation), Sam Calder-Mason (@samcm), Andrew Davis (@savid), Ansgar Dietrichs (@adietrichs)
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7691-blob-throughput-increase/19694
status: Review
status: Last Call
last-call-deadline: 2025-04-01
type: Standards Track
category: Core
created: 2024-04-17
Expand All @@ -20,8 +21,6 @@ Ethereum, with its rollup centric roadmap, scales by relying on L2. Since the De

As we now have the Dencun upgrade live, we are able to use monitoring tools to check the network health. Initial monitoring indicates that we have a stable network with the current gas target and the re-org rate is trending downwards. Additionally, analysis on messages in gossipsub indicate that the inclusion of `IDONTWANT` messages could bring us a significant bandwidth savings. This allows us to consider starting a series of big block and blob tests to determine the theoretical headroom we currently have. The EIP specifies a proposed new blob gas target and limit based on the series of tests.

Additional EIPs such as [EIP-7623](./eip-7623.md) proposes a calldata cost increase which would significantly lower the worst case base block size, thus creating more headroom for a potential blob throughput increase.

This EIP aims to increase the throughput short term to provide some scaling until future solutions are deployed. In order to alleviate valid concerns about solo-stakers, approaches such as the inclusion of a flag indicating the max blobs per block for locally built blocks could be considered.

## Specification
Expand Down
Loading