-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
Update EIP-4844: clarify to must be non-nil #7100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
nice number |
|
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
d6f9226 to
ca3b4f5
Compare
adietrichs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
eth-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
Pull request was converted to draft
Co-authored-by: Ansgar Dietrichs <[email protected]>
5cb1a10 to
1fb71fa
Compare
eth-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
@karalabe raised a concern that the current transaction type spec in 4844 is not clear on whether a
niltofield is allowed. This PR aims at clarifying any confusion around the correct representation of blob txs.