-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: Bump rakefile deps #6813
CI: Bump rakefile deps #6813
Conversation
File
|
3f2cf66
to
df1036b
Compare
df1036b
to
8e48dc0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you mind running the GitHub pages action to make sure this still works?
bc615f3
to
45a1f65
Compare
45a1f65
to
7cea027
Compare
267e327
to
5144000
Compare
5144000
to
1224149
Compare
The commit 1224149 (as a parent of bf2aae7) contains errors. |
Hi @Pandapip1 I re-ran and the build passes. The newer version of HTML-proofer has different options, so I matched to those. It is now more explicit about its options and in the future we can un-disable some of the checks to improve the website and SEO. However, one of the checks was not disableable so I need to touch EIP-2535 to add image alt tags. This means the HTML-proofer check passes in CI just like it did yesterday. If there's EIP editor approval or no complaints from @mudgen, hoping that is allowed. Also because I touched 2535, the EIP validator attacked me about lots of modernization it wants for that PR. Since this PR is an editorial change, not a content change, and because the scope of the PR is to fix build dependencies, I request that test failure can be ignored and EIP editors can override and merge this PR as-is. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR has a well-defined scope and makes the minimum number of changes.
Thank you @Pandapip1, are other reviews required to push this through? |
Just any other editor. CC @SamWilsn |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM to updating ruby version, and LGTM if that requires new htmlproofer and also require image to be updated to support accessibility.
Co-authored-by: Jan Turk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jan Turk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jan Turk <[email protected]>
This bumps dependencies a little bit (just latest GitHub Pages gem) and fixes the build on macOS