Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIP-888 -- Fungible non-tradable tokens, or EXP #4968

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dtedesco1
Copy link
Contributor

@dtedesco1 dtedesco1 commented Apr 2, 2022

A need exists for fungible tokens that indicate reputation in a community, rather than serve as tradable assets. Lack of such assets contributes to destructive pay-to-play dynamics in today's DAOs and blockchain games. Vitalik Buterin writes "ad nauseum" (his words) about this problem. EIP-888 seeks solutions via a token standard similar to EXP in games or Reddit Karma.

Existing proposals and discussions for non-tradable token standards (namely, EIP-4671 and EIP-1238) have been reviewed deeply. Both are optimizing for credentials or badges, which are very different use cases from EXP.

For more background information, please view the discussion on Ethereum Magicians here..

@dtedesco1
Copy link
Contributor Author

0x941A902aEaf7CeC119DF928676D23CE352273Ea5

@Inkinkinkink29 I'm not sure what's meant by this. Can you explain?

@dtedesco1 dtedesco1 changed the title Create EIP-EXP -- Fungible, non-tradable tokens EIP-888 -- Fungible non-tradable tokens, or EXP Apr 4, 2022
@dtedesco1 dtedesco1 marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2022 16:02
Copy link
Member

@Pandapip1 Pandapip1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are a few changes that must be made.

.gitignore Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-888.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@Pandapip1 Pandapip1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The assets MUST be CC0

assets/eip-888/ERC888.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
assets/eip-888/IERC888Metadata.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
assets/eip-888/IERC888.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Apr 5, 2022

Hi! I'm a bot, and I wanted to automerge your PR, but couldn't because of the following issue(s):


(fail) eip-888.md

classification
newEIPFile
  • File with name EIPS/eip-888.md is new and new files must be reviewed
  • This PR requires review from one of [@lightclient, @axic, @SamWilsn]

(pass) assets/eip-888/ERC888.sol

classification
ambiguous
  • file assets/eip-888/ERC888.sol is associated with EIP 888; because there are also changes being made to EIPS/eip-888.md all changes to corresponding assets are also allowed

(pass) assets/eip-888/IERC888.sol

classification
ambiguous
  • file assets/eip-888/IERC888.sol is associated with EIP 888; because there are also changes being made to EIPS/eip-888.md all changes to corresponding assets are also allowed

(pass) assets/eip-888/IERC888Metadata.sol

classification
ambiguous
  • file assets/eip-888/IERC888Metadata.sol is associated with EIP 888; because there are also changes being made to EIPS/eip-888.md all changes to corresponding assets are also allowed

@MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

I'm closing all PRs that were open on April 1st since we received a number of "joke" EIPs. If this was in fact a serious EIP that you would like to have reviewed, please resubmit.

Note: Please keep in mind that EIP editors are all volunteers and have more work than time available.

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member

@MicahZoltu this was a real one, but was superceded by #4974

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants