Skip to content

Conversation

@frangio
Copy link
Contributor

@frangio frangio commented Dec 1, 2025

No description provided.

@frangio frangio requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner December 1, 2025 18:52
@frangio frangio marked this pull request as draft December 1, 2025 18:52
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-review This EIP is in Review t-core labels Dec 1, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Dec 1, 2025

✅ All reviewers have approved.

@frangio frangio marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2025 18:53
@eth-bot eth-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) December 1, 2025 18:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@eth-bot eth-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@eth-bot eth-bot merged commit 5e6b0c2 into ethereum:master Dec 1, 2025
10 checks passed
@frangio frangio deleted the 8024-tests branch December 2, 2025 22:15
fjl pushed a commit to ethereum/go-ethereum that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
The EIP says to increment PC by 2 _instead of_ the standard increment by
1. The opcode handlers added in #33095 result in incrementing PC by 3,
because they ignored the increment already present in `interpreter.go`.

Does this need to be better specified in the EIP? I've added a [new test
case](ethereum/EIPs#10859) for it anyway.

Found by @0xriptide.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-review This EIP is in Review t-core

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants