Skip to content

Conversation

@ANtutov
Copy link
Contributor

@ANtutov ANtutov commented Nov 28, 2025

This change specifies the exact RLP encoding of the execution header when introducing target_blobs_per_block, placing the new uint64 field at the end of the header after parent_beacon_block_root in line with how other EIPs extend the header (e.g., EIP-4788, EIP-7591). It clarifies the type and minimal big-endian RLP encoding, aligns “first post-fork block” terminology with EIP-4844 initialization rules, and states the Engine API/serialization invariant that consensus clients must provide target_blobs_per_block and execution clients must serialize it per the defined RLP layout. These additions remove ambiguity for implementers and ensure deterministic serialization and cross-client compatibility.

@ANtutov ANtutov requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner November 28, 2025 18:56
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-stagnant This EIP is Stagnant t-core labels Nov 28, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Nov 28, 2025

File EIPS/eip-7742.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @ralexstokes
Requires 1 more reviewers from @g11tech, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@eth-bot eth-bot added the a-review Waiting on author to review label Nov 28, 2025

For a genesis block with no existing parent, the value should be set according to the agreed specification for the
target blob count given by that genesis block's protocol rule set.
For the first post-fork block, `parent.blob_gas_used` and `parent.excess_blob_gas` are evaluated as `0` as in EIP-4844, and the parent’s `target_blobs_per_block` is provided by the consensus layer and committed in the parent header per the RLP encoding above.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems to need author confirmation
also the EIP is stagnant, unless you wanna revive it there is no point making material changes to the technical content

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

a-review Waiting on author to review c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-stagnant This EIP is Stagnant t-core

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants