Skip to content

Conversation

@agronetlabs
Copy link

Summary

This PR proposes ATF-AI as a Core EIP defining an AI-native governance framework for ESG-compliant asset tokenization, with post-quantum security and deterministic compliance enforcement.


Context

This is a resubmission of #10316 after implementing all editor feedback from:

Previous PR: #10316 (closed for revisions - changes not reflected due to closure timing)
Related PR: ethereum/ERCs #1313 (ERC-8040: Token Interface - Active)


Changes Implemented Since #10316

Structural Separation:

  • This PR (Core): ATF-AI governance framework, AI-Compliance definition, PQC attestation protocol
  • ethereum/ERCs EIP-1283: remove Version I #1313 (Application): Token interfaces, metadata schemas, events

Technical Corrections:

  • ✅ Fixed struct order (Attestation before Metadata) - addresses Solidity compilation issue
  • ✅ Corrected all Markdown formatting (removed 57 backslash errors)
  • ✅ Updated all references with complete repository links and commit hashes
  • ✅ Renamed file from eip-agrocrypto-quantum.md to eip-8040.md
  • ✅ Fixed discussions-to link to active Ethereum Magicians thread (#25846)

Commits in This PR:

  • 355810b6 - Rename eip-agrocrypto-quantum.md to eip-8040.md (2025-11-02)
  • 40e7045f - fix: correct struct order, update references, and improve formatting (2025-11-02)
  • e62a91fc - fix: update discussions-to link to correct Ethereum Magicians thread (2025-11-02 08:24 UTC)

Why Core (Not ERC)?

1. Protocol-Level Governance Framework

Layer Component Location
Protocol/Core • ATF-AI governance framework
• AI-Compliance definition (AI-Compliance = AI-Governed DAO)
• Post-quantum attestation protocol
• Cross-chain governance primitives
This PR
Application • Token interfaces (mintESGToken, auditESGToken, retireESGToken)
• Metadata JSON schemas
• Solidity events
ethereum/ERCs #1313

This is not "how to build ESG tokens" (that's ERC-8040).
This defines "what AI-native compliance governance means at protocol level".


2. Precedent: EIP-4337 Model

EIP-4337 (Account Abstraction) established:

  • Core layer: Bundler, UserOperation, EntryPoint concepts
  • ERC-4337: Interface specifications

This PR follows the same pattern:

  • Core EIP: ATF-AI governance, AI-Compliance principle, PQC framework
  • ERC-8040: Token implementation using the framework

3. Technical Differentiation

This PR introduces:

  • Machine-verifiable governance mechanisms (deterministic compliance)
  • Post-quantum cryptographic standards (SHA3-512 as protocol requirement)
  • AI-Governed DAO as protocol-level concept (not implementation detail)
  • Cross-chain governance primitives for multi-chain ESG compliance

ERC-8040 provides:

  • Solidity interfaces (IERC8040)
  • Metadata JSON formats
  • Smart contract events (Minted, Attested, Retired)

Reference Implementation

All technical details remain compliance-grade and publicly verifiable:

Primary Repositories:

  • EIP-8040 Implementation: agronetlabs/ESG-TOKENIZATION-PROTOCOL

    • Reference implementation for EIP-8040: ESG Tokenization Protocol
    • Commit: aaee88d76550874d7691f0ebfa4a40fc7f928a15
    • Rust crate: agrocrypto-quantum-core
  • ATF-AI Governance Framework: agronetlabs/ATF-AI

    • Compliance-as-a-Service Protocol (AI-Governed DAO)
    • Commit: b76ff16aa6b64ce35d020ab3e147049f2dad3654
    • OpenAPI verification endpoint: /verify

Supporting Resources:

Cryptographic Verification:

  • Integrity Hashes:
    • ESG-TOKENIZATION-PROTOCOL: aaee88d76550874d7691f0ebfa4a40fc7f928a15
    • ATF-AI: b76ff16aa6b64ce35d020ab3e147049f2dad3654
  • Digest Standard: SHA3-512, timestamped, immutable
  • Provenance: All commits signed and traceable

Requested Editor Decision

Questions for editors:

  1. Should this be accepted as Core EIP (governance framework)?
  2. Should this follow EIP-4337 precedent (Core + ERC split)?
  3. Should this be reclassified as Meta EIP (defines principle, references ERC-8040)?
  4. Or should everything consolidate into ERC-8040 only in ethereum/ERCs?

I'm committed to aligning with community standards. If consensus is "ERCs only," I will consolidate without debate and update ethereum/ERCs #1313 accordingly.


Related PRs


All technical feedback from Sep 16 and Oct 07 Meeting #74 has been addressed.
Ready for editor review and community discussion.

Reviewers: @abcoathup @g1ltech @SamWilsn @poojaranjan

agronetlabs and others added 17 commits September 10, 2025 02:56
This commit introduces the AgroCrypto Quantum Governance EIP, detailing the ESG tokenization protocol with specifications for metadata, lifecycle methods, and security considerations.
Added details for AgroCrypto Quantum Governance and ESG Tokenization Protocol.
Removed draft information for AgroCrypto Quantum Governance proposal.
Updated the title and clarified the repository's focus on AgroCrypto Quantum Governance.
Removed specific project title and updated header.
Updated EIP for AgroCrypto Quantum Governance to include EIP number and refined title and description. Enhanced metadata structure and added security considerations.
Updated EIP-8040 to define ESG Tokenization Protocol with improved description, metadata structure, and compliance considerations.
@agronetlabs agronetlabs requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner November 2, 2025 09:37
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 2, 2025 09:37
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-new Creates a brand new proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core labels Nov 2, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Nov 2, 2025

File EIPS/eip-8040.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @g11tech, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

File README.md

Requires 2 more reviewers from @g11tech, @lightclient, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv

@eth-bot eth-bot added e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review labels Nov 2, 2025
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Add Core EIP: ATF-AI Governance Framework for ESG Compliance Update README: ATF-AI Governance Framework for ESG Compliance Nov 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Nov 2, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 2, 2025

The commit e62a91f (as a parent of d7583e6) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR proposes a new EIP-8040 for ESG tokenization and updates the README title. The EIP-8040 introduces a standards track protocol for compliance-grade, AI-native ESG asset tokenization with lifecycle management and quantum security features, while the README receives a minor title formatting change.

  • Adds new EIP-8040 specification for ESG Tokenization Protocol
  • Updates README title formatting
  • Defines lifecycle methods, metadata structure, and attestation framework for ESG tokens

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

File Description
README.md Updated title formatting from separate heading to inline format
EIPS/eip-8040.md New EIP specification introducing ESG tokenization standard with AI governance and post-quantum security

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@github-actions github-actions bot added t-erc and removed t-core labels Nov 2, 2025
Copy link
Author

@agronetlabs agronetlabs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

@github-actions github-actions bot added t-core and removed t-erc labels Nov 2, 2025
Copy link
Author

@agronetlabs agronetlabs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Nov 2, 2025
@agronetlabs agronetlabs closed this Nov 3, 2025
@agronetlabs agronetlabs reopened this Nov 4, 2025
Copy link
Author

@agronetlabs agronetlabs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@abcoathup
Copy link
Contributor

Note: I am not an editor

Should this be accepted as Core EIP (governance framework)?

No. It is application layer and should be an ERC.

Should this follow EIP-4337 precedent (Core + ERC split)?

There isn't a precedent. It is an ERC: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4337

Should this be reclassified as Meta EIP (defines principle, references ERC-8040)?

No.

Or should everything consolidate into ERC-8040 only in ethereum/ERCs?

Yes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c-new Creates a brand new proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants