feat(devstack): add minimal preset

[sigma]

Description

This adds a lightweight preset for sanity checks.
This will be used by basic acceptance tests.

Tests

Additional context

Metadata

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.42%. Comparing base (38a0210) to head (3097bac).
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #15842   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    81.42%   81.42%           
========================================
  Files          161      161           
  Lines         8822     8822           
========================================
  Hits          7183     7183           
  Misses        1506     1506           
  Partials       133      133           

Flag	Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests-64	65.37% <ø> (ø)
contracts-bedrock-tests	96.24% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[pcw109550]

I guess that the single L2CL is initialized by using the interop config, by default it would be in managed mode. The L2CL must be connected to the supervisor in managed mode to advance its heads.

So I think we need a supervisor for the minimal preset, and It would be nice to add basic unit test for confirming that L2CL is advancing in this settting.

[sigma]

I guess that the single L2CL is initialized by using the interop config, by default it would be in managed mode. The L2CL must be connected to the supervisor in managed mode to advance its heads.

So I think we need a supervisor for the minimal preset, and It would be nice to add basic unit test for confirming that L2CL is advancing in this settting.

Hmm, are you sure about this?
I mean, my goal was to model a non-interop system here, so it'd be disappointing to have to add a supervisor.

And it seems that L2CL is advancing fine without it. Can you take a look at the test I added for that?