Skip to content

Yxjetcd rangestream#12343

Closed
yangxuanjia wants to merge 22 commits intoetcd-io:mainfrom
yangxuanjia:yxjetcd_rangestream
Closed

Yxjetcd rangestream#12343
yangxuanjia wants to merge 22 commits intoetcd-io:mainfrom
yangxuanjia:yxjetcd_rangestream

Conversation

@yangxuanjia
Copy link
Contributor

@yangxuanjia yangxuanjia commented Sep 28, 2020

Please read https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-flow.

#12342
I will make an topic for resolve #12342 , and make test futhermore.
If maintainer think this PR is good, I will do the following things.(unit test, proxy rangestream and lease reagestream)

@yangxuanjia yangxuanjia mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 19, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed after 21 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot closed this Sep 2, 2021
chaochn47 added a commit to chaochn47/etcd that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2021
chaochn47 added a commit to chaochn47/etcd that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2021
@ptabor ptabor reopened this Feb 23, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Feb 23, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 11, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed after 21 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 11, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this Jul 10, 2022
@linxiulei
Copy link

Is this still WIP?

I am working on #14810 that shares the idea on #12343 (comment) and it uses pagination so it won't break the queries.

@ptabor
Copy link
Contributor

ptabor commented Nov 29, 2022

It's kept in the backlog - it doesn't seem there is a maintainer that has capacity to proceed with the project,
but technically it looks like a right thing to do.
Improving the reliability is definitely higher priority than this.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 26, 2025

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed after 21 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Large range queries from api-server could take down etcd due to OOM

9 participants