Skip to content

Conversation

@missinglink
Copy link
Contributor

This PR offers a proposal to fix #146

I'm not very familiar with the internals, so please let me know if there's a more elegant way of achieving this.

@missinglink
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favour of linked PR

@missinglink missinglink closed this Dec 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cursor.Delete followed by Next skips the next k/v pair

1 participant