Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wish list : Arduino ESP8266 support Espressif's ESP8266_NONOS_SDK release 3.0 #5264

Open
TridentTD opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@TridentTD
Copy link

TridentTD commented Oct 19, 2018

Espressif's ESP8266_NONOS_SDK release 3.0
now add partition table.

https://github.com/espressif/ESP8266_NONOS_SDK/blob/master/documents/EN/%20Partition%20Table.md

This feature is convient for changing size of partition and space for SSL/TSL CA cert.
Wish Arduino ESP8266 can use this feature too.

Thank you.

@devyte
Copy link
Collaborator

devyte commented Oct 25, 2018

Work on this is already ongoing, but unfortunately updating to the new sdk doesn't seem to be straightforward as in previous sdk updates.
Translation: at this point it builds, but doesn't work, and it will take a while to get it operational, and a long while to stabilize.

@brandond
Copy link

brandond commented Dec 29, 2018

I see there are a couple existing issues open asking for an update to the latest version of the NONOS-SDK. Is this still on the radar? The state of this work seems to be somewhat confusing since getFullVersion() already reports as being 3.0.0-dev, even though it seems to still be a 2.2 release:

SDK:3.0.0-dev(c0f7b44)/Core:unspecified=0/lwIP:STABLE-2_1_2_RELEASE/glue:1.0-6-g4670dfc/BearSSL:2398cc6

3.0.0 is seeing active maintenance: https://github.com/espressif/ESP8266_NONOS_SDK/commits/release/v3.0.0

@d-a-v
Copy link
Collaborator

d-a-v commented Dec 29, 2018

check also #5521
nonos-sdk-v3 "official" will happen after our release core-2.5.0.
Updating is not straightforward as it was with previous versions.
I also read some days ago that they might consider removing some restricting features about partition and size, but I can't find the link.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants