Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update comments to correctly refer to MarkdownSourceCode #291

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2024

Conversation

morinokami
Copy link
Contributor

Updated the JSDoc comments for the createSourceCode function to correctly refer to MarkdownSourceCode instead of JSONSourceCode.

@eslint-github-bot
Copy link

Hi @morinokami!, thanks for the Pull Request

The pull request title isn't properly formatted. We ask that you update the pull request title to match this format, as we use it to generate changelogs and automate releases.

  • The length of the commit message must be less than or equal to 72

To Fix: You can fix this problem by clicking 'Edit' next to the pull request title at the top of this page.

Read more about contributing to ESLint here

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 12, 2024

CLA Signed


The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@morinokami morinokami changed the title docs: Update comments to refer to MarkdownSourceCode instead of JSONSourceCode docs: Update comments to correctly refer to MarkdownSourceCode Oct 12, 2024
@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic changed the title docs: Update comments to correctly refer to MarkdownSourceCode chore: Update comments to correctly refer to MarkdownSourceCode Oct 12, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic merged commit 9c92c9f into eslint:main Oct 12, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants