docs: remove PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md in favor of centralized template
#666
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jul 11, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Hello,
In this PR, I have removed
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdin favor of using the centralized template.Since the PR to create the centralized
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATEhas been merged into the.githubrepository (ref: eslint/.github#9), the pull request template can now be managed from there.After reviewing the template in the
jsrepository, I noticed that it is very similar to the centralized version. For this reason, I am proposing to remove it here and maintain the template within the.githubrepository instead.Maintaining a separate PR template in this repository would override the template in the
.githubrepository, which would prevent us from fully benefiting from the centralized template.Related Issues
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?