Skip to content

Implement RemoteProcessImpl in terms of PerformNighthawkBenchmark()#548

Merged
mum4k merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom
oschaaf:issue-496
Sep 22, 2020
Merged

Implement RemoteProcessImpl in terms of PerformNighthawkBenchmark()#548
mum4k merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom
oschaaf:issue-496

Conversation

@oschaaf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@oschaaf oschaaf commented Sep 22, 2020

Drop duplicated code, use the newer code that has better test
coverage plus handling for when multiple results would be received.
This also makes the newer code run with the pre-existing end-to-end testing
for this.

Fixes #496

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf oschaaf@we-amp.com

Drop duplicated code, use the newer code that has better test
coverage plus handling for when multiple results would be received.

Fixes envoyproxy#496

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
@oschaaf oschaaf added the waiting-for-review A PR waiting for a review. label Sep 22, 2020
@oschaaf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

oschaaf commented Sep 22, 2020

/cc @eric846

@mum4k mum4k merged commit 8ed1f68 into envoyproxy:master Sep 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

waiting-for-review A PR waiting for a review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dedupe code between PerformNighthawkBenchmark and RemoteProcessImpl::run

2 participants