-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
chore: add issue and pull request templates #515
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ | ||
| **Description** | ||
|
|
||
| This PR fixes # | ||
|
|
||
| **Notes for Reviewers** | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- | ||
| Thank you for contributing to Nighthawk! | ||
|
|
||
| Contributing Conventions: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Build and test your changes before submitting a PR. | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe mention familiarizing oneself with https://github.com/envoyproxy/nighthawk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md ?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I guess you are right, also we can mention the DCO requirement I guess.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good idea, yes. There's also pre-push/pre-commit hooks in https://github.com/envoyproxy/nighthawk/tree/master/support that may help with that.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd actually argue further to Otto's point that I'd prefer we not duplicate where our contributing conventions are. I'd prefer to only reference the other markdown file here rather than specify some conventions and reference it here. I could probably be convinced in a different direction if you feel strongly.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Agree, we can reference the markdown file here than the other way around. |
||
|
|
||
| By following the community's contribution conventions upfront, the review process will | ||
| be accelerated and your PR merged more quickly. | ||
| --> | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| name: Non-{crash,security} bug | ||
| about: Bugs which are not crashes, DoS or other security issue | ||
| title: '' | ||
| labels: bug,triage | ||
| assignees: '' | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| *Title*: *One line description* | ||
|
|
||
| *Description*: | ||
| >What issue is being seen? Describe what should be happening instead of | ||
| the bug, for example: Nighthawk should not crash, the expected value isn't | ||
| returned, etc. | ||
|
|
||
| *Reproduction steps*: | ||
| > Include sample requests, environment, etc. All data and inputs | ||
| required to reproduce the bug. | ||
|
|
||
| >**Note**: If there are privacy concerns, sanitize the data prior to | ||
| sharing. | ||
|
|
||
| *Logs*: | ||
| >Include the Nighthawk logs. | ||
|
|
||
| >**Note**: If there are privacy concerns, sanitize the data prior to | ||
| sharing. | ||
|
|
||
| *Call Stack*: | ||
| > If the Envoy binary is crashing, a call stack is **required**. | ||
| Please refer to the [Bazel Stack trace documentation](https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/tree/master/bazel#stack-trace-symbol-resolution). |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| name: Feature request | ||
| about: Suggest an idea for this project | ||
| title: '' | ||
| labels: enhancement,triage | ||
| assignees: '' | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| *Title*: *One line description* | ||
|
|
||
| *Description*: | ||
| >Describe the the desired behavior, what scenario it enables and how it | ||
| would be used. | ||
|
|
||
| [optional *Relevant Links*:] | ||
| >Any extra documentation required to understand the issue. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we edit this language a little? I appreciate encouraging people to link to issues, but I don't think we want a 1:1 of issues to PRs, because it encourages longer PRs that are harder to review.
Maybe
This PR is related to.I'm also curious whether we should include anything about this template being a guideline, rather than set in stone. For instance, this PR is not related to an ongoing issue, and I'm not sure we would've gotten any benefit by suggesting that you should have created one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can add a comment saying if the PR is related to an issue then mention it below