Skip to content

dump config for flaky dynamic resover test#6196

Merged
zhaohuabing merged 3 commits intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
zhaohuabing:dump-flaky-dynamic-resovler-test
May 28, 2025
Merged

dump config for flaky dynamic resover test#6196
zhaohuabing merged 3 commits intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
zhaohuabing:dump-flaky-dynamic-resovler-test

Conversation

@zhaohuabing
Copy link
Member

@zhaohuabing zhaohuabing commented May 27, 2025

Dump config to debug #6194

Signed-off-by: Huabing (Robin) Zhao <zhaohuabing@gmail.com>
@zhaohuabing zhaohuabing requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2025 03:12
zirain
zirain previously approved these changes May 27, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.59%. Comparing base (cbb5381) to head (e0c8c07).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6196      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.61%   70.59%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         219      219              
  Lines       36515    36515              
==========================================
- Hits        25786    25778       -8     
- Misses       9201     9208       +7     
- Partials     1528     1529       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Signed-off-by: Huabing (Robin) Zhao <zhaohuabing@gmail.com>
@zhaohuabing zhaohuabing requested a review from zirain May 27, 2025 10:20
},
}

var DynamicResolverBackendWithTLSTest = suite.ConformanceTest{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QQ: why split them into two test? They should be able run in same test for short time cost.

Copy link
Member Author

@zhaohuabing zhaohuabing May 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be easier to debug the flaky when running the non-TLS and TLS in different tests - they didn't fail at the same time in the previous flaky tests.

@zhaohuabing zhaohuabing requested a review from zirain May 28, 2025 01:59
@zhaohuabing zhaohuabing merged commit 8d9174b into envoyproxy:main May 28, 2025
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants